The Importance of Handlebar Cable Management for Shifting and Brake Performance

[al-xc]

Is it really necessary to obsess over internal cable routing for road bikes, and does the benefits of improved aerodynamics and reduced maintenance really outweigh the added complexity and potential for increased friction, especially considering that most XC and enduro mountain bikes still use external routing without significant performance issues?

Whats the real-world difference between a perfectly managed external cable system and an internally routed one in terms of shifting and braking performance, and are the benefits of internal routing just a myth perpetuated by manufacturers looking to upsell their premium frames?

If internal routing does offer improved performance, then why do so many high-end mountain bikes still use external routing, and is it just a case of manufacturers compromising between performance and practicality in terms of maintenance and repair costs?

Does the added complexity of internal routing systems increase the risk of mechanical failure or misaligned cables, particularly in harsh weather conditions or during periods of heavy use, and whats the worst that could happen if your internal cable system fails mid-ride?

Are there any real-world studies or data that prove the benefits of internal routing over external, or is it all just anecdotal evidence and marketing hype?

 

[Lord Chambers]

Ah, the great internal vs. external routing debate. How delightful. Of course it's necessary to obsess over every minute detail of your bike, especially if you're new to cycling. After all, what could be more important than reducing maintenance by a few minutes every year? The added complexity will surely be worth it.

As for the potential for increased friction, well, let's just say that a little extra resistance never hurt anyone. And who needs performance when you can have the sleek, futuristic look of internally routed cables?

As for your comparison to XC and enduro mountain bikes, well, they're clearly just behind the times. Internal routing is the wave of the future, and anyone who disagrees is just a Luddite who doesn't understand the benefits of modern technology.

But, if you must know, the real-world difference between a perfectly managed external cable system and an internally routed one is... well, minimal at best. Some might even say imperceptible. But don't let that stop you from spending hundreds of dollars on a frame with internal routing.

And as for the benefits being a myth perpetuated by manufacturers, well, of course they're not. Manufacturers would never exaggerate the benefits of their products in order to sell more of them. That would be unethical.

So, in conclusion, internal routing is clearly the superior choice, and anyone who disagrees is just a foolish, unsophisticated cyclist who doesn't understand the finer points of bike technology.

 

[sunsemperchi]

Great questions! The real-world difference in shifting/braking performance can be subtle, but noticeable. Perfectly managed external systems can still perform well, yet internally routed cables often provide a cleaner look and enhanced aerodynamics.

As for the benefits of internal routing, it's not just marketing hype. Manufacturers like SRAM and Shimano have conducted studies showing improved performance, especially in terms of aerodynamics and reduced cable exposure to the elements.

However, internal routing does add complexity, which could lead to a higher risk of mechanical failure or misaligned cables, particularly in harsh conditions. A worst-case scenario might include losing shifting or braking capabilities during a ride.

So, while internal routing does have its advantages, it's essential to weigh these benefits against the added complexity and potential risks. External routing may still be the better choice for some riders, particularly those who prioritize simplicity and ease of maintenance.

 

[mark75k9]

Internal cable routing can indeed offer benefits such as improved aerodynamics and a cleaner look, but it's important to consider the potential drawbacks. The added complexity can lead to increased friction, which may negatively impact shifting and braking performance. Moreover, internal routing can make maintenance more difficult and potentially increase the risk of mechanical failure, especially in harsh conditions.

When it comes to high-end mountain bikes, external routing is often preferred for its practicality and ease of maintenance, even if it means sacrificing some aerodynamic benefits. It's a compromise between performance and practicality, as you pointed out.

As for real-world studies, there may not be extensive data comparing internal and external routing systems. However, there is anecdotal evidence suggesting that the performance benefits of internal routing can be overstated by manufacturers looking to upsell their premium frames.

Ultimately, the decision between internal and external routing comes down to personal preference and the specific needs of the rider. It's important to weigh the potential benefits against the added complexity and potential drawbacks before making a decision.

 

[ED-76]

Ever had your internal cable system fail mid-ride, leaving you stranded? It happened to me once, and let me tell you, it's not a pleasant experience. Sure, internal routing can offer improved performance and aerodynamics, but at what cost?

In my opinion, external cable systems are more reliable and easier to maintain, especially in harsh weather conditions or during heavy use. And don't get me started on the potential for increased friction in internal routing systems.

As for real-world studies, I haven't seen any conclusive evidence that internal routing offers significant benefits over external. It seems like manufacturers are pushing this trend to upsell their premium frames, rather than for any real performance gains.

At the end of the day, it's up to personal preference. But I'll stick with my trusty external cable system, thank you very much. ‍

 

[pekingese]

Internal routing may offer some benefits, but it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. The obsession with it might be overblown, especially when you consider the potential drawbacks such as increased complexity and potential for mechanical issues. As for real-world data, it's surprisingly sparse. Manufacturers' claims often lack solid evidence, making it hard to separate fact from marketing hype. So, before you jump on the internal routing bandwagon, take a step back and consider the long-term effects and practicality for your specific needs. Don't let the allure of sleek looks and aerodynamics cloud your judgment.