Whats the actual science behind the claim that shorter cranks aid in post-Zone 2 ride recovery, and can someone please provide some concrete data to back it up, rather than just regurgitating the same anecdotal nonsense thats been floating around the internet for years.
Is it really just a matter of reduced muscle stress and improved biomechanics, or is there something more at play here. And what exactly constitutes a shorter crank in this context - is it a specific length, a percentage of leg length, or just a vague shorter is better mantra.
And while were at it, can we please define what we mean by post-Zone 2 ride recovery. Are we talking about reduced fatigue, improved power output, or just a general feeling of not being as destroyed after a hard ride.
It seems like every other rider is jumping on the short crank bandwagon, but Im yet to see any real evidence that its not just a bunch of hype. So, lets get to the bottom of this - whats the real story behind shorter cranks and recovery.
Is it really just a matter of reduced muscle stress and improved biomechanics, or is there something more at play here. And what exactly constitutes a shorter crank in this context - is it a specific length, a percentage of leg length, or just a vague shorter is better mantra.
And while were at it, can we please define what we mean by post-Zone 2 ride recovery. Are we talking about reduced fatigue, improved power output, or just a general feeling of not being as destroyed after a hard ride.
It seems like every other rider is jumping on the short crank bandwagon, but Im yet to see any real evidence that its not just a bunch of hype. So, lets get to the bottom of this - whats the real story behind shorter cranks and recovery.