UK and Europe · Public discussion

The exception that proves the rule ...

Started by Don Whybrow · · Last activity · 5 posts · 253 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 January 2007
Last activity
13 January 2007
Original author
Don Whybrow
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
253
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My, it has been a tad blustery these past couple of days. However I
    experienced the impossible as we all know it never happens. I had wind
    assist not only up hills, but down a few as well. On one occasion I was
    just setting off from a set of traffic lights when I was hit by a
    massive gust from behind and crossed the junction in record time. Mind
    you, I also had a fair share of into and across wind and gust riding.
    Very exhilarating, especially as the motorised traffic did not seem to
    be as affected by it as I was.

    --
    Don Whybrow

    Sequi Bonum Non Time

    "I've noticed that the press tends to be quite accurate, except when
    they're writing on a subject I know something about." (Keith F. Lynch)

  2. Don Whybrow wrote on 12/01/2007 22:10 +0100:

    Quoted message said:

    My, it has been a tad blustery these past couple of days. However I
    experienced the impossible as we all know it never happens. I had wind
    assist not only up hills, but down a few as well. On one occasion I was
    just setting off from a set of traffic lights when I was hit by a
    massive gust from behind and crossed the junction in record time. Mind
    you, I also had a fair share of into and across wind and gust riding.
    Very exhilarating, especially as the motorised traffic did not seem to
    be as affected by it as I was.

    Me too. Couldn't believe it but the wind has been behind me for all my
    journeys the last couple of days. Mind you the short stint I had to do
    into the wind was gruelling.

    --
    Tony

    "...has many omissions and contains much that is apocryphal, or at least
    wildly inaccurate..."
    Douglas Adams; The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

  3. Don Whybrow said:

    My, it has been a tad blustery these past couple of days. However I
    experienced the impossible as we all know it never happens. I had wind
    assist not only up hills, but down a few as well. On one occasion I was
    just setting off from a set of traffic lights when I was hit by a
    massive gust from behind and crossed the junction in record time. Mind
    you, I also had a fair share of into and across wind and gust riding.
    Very exhilarating, especially as the motorised traffic did not seem to
    be as affected by it as I was.

    A common misconception is that the phrase which forms the title of
    this post means something like "for rules there sometimes are
    contradictory instances.

    It does not.

    The true meaning of the phrase is that it is unusual cases that test
    ("prove"😉 the validity of a rule.

  4. Quoted message said:


    A common misconception is that the phrase which forms the title of
    this post means something like "for rules there sometimes are
    contradictory instances.

    It does not.

    The true meaning of the phrase is that it is unusual cases that test
    ("prove"😉 the validity of a rule.

    I am aware of Karl Popper

    --
    Don Whybrow

    Sequi Bonum Non Time

    "There is a wicked pretense that one has been informed. But no such
    thing has truly occurred! A mere slogan, an empty litany. No arguments
    are heard, no evidence is weighed. It isn't news at all, only a source
    of amusement for idlers." (Gibson-Sterling, The Difference Engine)

  5. Quoted message said:


    A common misconception is that the phrase which forms the title of
    this post means something like "for rules there sometimes are
    contradictory instances.

    It does not.

    The true meaning of the phrase is that it is unusual cases that test
    ("prove"😉 the validity of a rule.

    Actually, there are at least two schools of thought. The more
    plausible one (to me) is that it means that the exceptions to a rule
    demonstrate the general applicability of the rule.

    For example "Do not walk on the grass except on Tuesdays" indicates
    that on Monday you definitely must not walk on the grass. The
    explicit exception for Tuesday reinforces the general applicability.

    regards, Ian SMith
    --
    |\ /| no .sig
    |o o|
    |/ \|

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.