Is the widely-held assumption that long Zone 2 rides are essential for building endurance in multi-stage races actually a hindrance to performance for many cyclists?
Considering the specificity of demands in multi-stage racing, where riders are often required to perform at high intensities for short periods, does the emphasis on Zone 2 training neglect the development of critical high-intensity endurance and anaerobic capabilities?
Furthermore, given the increasing body of evidence suggesting that polarized training can be highly effective for endurance athletes, is the traditional long, slow distance (LSD) approach to Zone 2 training simply a relic of outdated thinking?
Do the benefits of increased mitochondrial density, capillarization, and myoglobin levels associated with Zone 2 training outweigh the potential drawbacks of reduced high-intensity fitness, decreased neuromuscular coordination, and increased risk of overreaching?
Are we mistakenly prioritizing the wrong physiological adaptations in our pursuit of endurance performance, and if so, what are the implications for the way we structure our training programs?
Considering the specificity of demands in multi-stage racing, where riders are often required to perform at high intensities for short periods, does the emphasis on Zone 2 training neglect the development of critical high-intensity endurance and anaerobic capabilities?
Furthermore, given the increasing body of evidence suggesting that polarized training can be highly effective for endurance athletes, is the traditional long, slow distance (LSD) approach to Zone 2 training simply a relic of outdated thinking?
Do the benefits of increased mitochondrial density, capillarization, and myoglobin levels associated with Zone 2 training outweigh the potential drawbacks of reduced high-intensity fitness, decreased neuromuscular coordination, and increased risk of overreaching?
Are we mistakenly prioritizing the wrong physiological adaptations in our pursuit of endurance performance, and if so, what are the implications for the way we structure our training programs?