General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

the eating intelligence

Started by bob · · Last activity · 46 posts · 1,091 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
15 December 2004
Last activity
19 December 2004
Original author
bob
Posts
46
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,091
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 46
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The Low-Carb Bartender wrote:
    :: "> :: It boils down to moderation, and not deprivation.
    :::
    ::: But most of us "naturally fat" people know nothing of moderation.
    ::: So, if it
    ::: boils down to moderation, how are we supposed to be able to reach
    ::: that state? IMO, this is just like saying "eat less".
    ::
    :: It's called personal responsibility. Start dealing with it, like
    :: dropping the weak excuse of being "naturally fat."

    Ah ha....so you just think you know how everything works for everyone.
    Naturally.
    If moderation worked for everyone, then none of us would really need LC, we
    could just do LF or simply eat less of all kinds of foods. You obviously
    don't understand why that doesn't work.

  2. bob wrote:
    :: It would be inaccurate to say nothing changed. Something did change
    :: (weight, waistlines). the problem seems to be that behaviors and
    :: habits did not change.

    They did not change permanently. Old habits die hard....

  3. nothing changes permamently, except death, and even that has
    phases....(having worked next door to the autopsy room, you learn a lot of
    weird stuff....)

    therefore to say nothing changed is to deny the word has meaning. Losing
    weight, even for a month is a change. It may not be that significant, but it
    is more significant than someone who never lost weight, and does not even
    know it is possible.

    "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    bob wrote:
    :: It would be inaccurate to say nothing changed. Something did change
    :: (weight, waistlines). the problem seems to be that behaviors and
    :: habits did not change.

    They did not change permanently. Old habits die hard....

  4. "Ignoramus3578" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom said:

    You are correct. It's not like I did a scientific study on myself.


    When

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I was at normal weight up to my middle 30's, I had no problem with acid
    reflux. The shear weight itself of the stomach area being pulled to one


    side

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    may be in fact a greater influence than the diet itself. Because the

    While I was fat, I did not have a "huge" stomach. See
    http://igor.chudov.com/weightloss/ for pre and post pictures.

    My heartburn went away almost immediately after I started dieting, way
    before I lost any appreciable weight.

    Quoted message said:

    problems disappeared at the same time it is difficult to know for sure.


    I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    did some experiments in the earlier stage of the diet to see if wheat
    products were the key. I did suffer from heartburn that night. But,


    thinking

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    back, it is possible that I ate to much at the time and that could be


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    problem. My achy shoulders could even have been attributed to increased


    fat

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    causing decrease of motion and also lack of muscle around the joint


    could

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    have been a problem. Even in simple observations, there could be many
    variations. I can not deny that one possiblity is better than another.


    All I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    can say is that I feel good right now and I have no physical ailments


    due to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the way I eat. Is it just the weightloss itself? It's very possible.

    A good decision making approach.

    Quoted message said:

    Increased hunger after not being as strict will be my fear. So far

    Come on, people are hungry all the time all over the world, it does
    not kill them. If you find hunger to be too irritating, come back to
    LC.

    I am still on low carb, but there is a lot of peer pressure to relax
    about my Nazi-like attitude about it. I think that if I relax too much, I'll
    go back to eating too much because of hunger. But you are right, if I do
    ever decide that eating at an increased carb level causes hunger to be too
    unpleasant I could always become more strict.
    Recently I have included beans occasionally to my list of allowable
    foods. Our homemade chili does not look like regular chili, as the amount of
    beans is small. It is largely chunks of cut up steak or roast with some
    added onions, celery, and green pepper, spices and A1 steak sauce, tomato
    sauce. I try to add little amounts of any higher carb item and see if there
    is any noticable affect in new recipes.
    The amounts that are included still don't satisfy what my friends would
    consider a reasonable diet. It is still to obvious to them that I am eating
    lo-carb. The problem really, is that I feel I am eating properly, but
    everyone else thinks that their high carb diet is the best. Of course, I am
    one of the slimmest among them but that doesn't matter. I think that the
    only way to show them is to continue as long as there are no side affects,
    and show them that my weight is stable over a period of a few years. I can
    not blame anyone who is skeptical as there is a lot of conflicting data on
    just about anything you can think of. I myself am like that as well. I like
    to see proof rather than follow blindly.
    So far the lo-carb style of eating has shown me that lots of people can
    be led to believe whatever is spoonfed to them. The fact that high carb has
    been touted for so long is evidence of that. Any disagreement with what they
    have been taught can cause anger rather than curiosity. I am a little
    different. If someone can provide good evidence for a case, I am more
    inclined to at least hear the story and try and look up facts to see if it
    is plausible. Some of the people that I have talked to about lo-carb can
    only repeat the bad things they have heard about it. When asked why they
    think pastas, white bread, rice, sugar, and potatoes are necessary and what
    vitamins and nutrients they get out of them, they can't think of a good
    reason. When I try to explain about their affect on blood sugar and insulin
    spikes, it falls on deaf ears. Most people only rely on what is heard in the
    news media, or tend to think the food pyramid is the ultimate guide. Sorry,
    I've been rambling much longer than I thought. I'll close it off here.
    Tom

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    my weight is managable and I like that my food choices are not
    sweet. My energy levels 'feel to me' to be stable and I really like
    that.

    Ditto.

    --
    223/172.4/180

  5. "> If moderation worked for everyone, then none of us would really need LC,
    we

    Quoted message said:

    could just do LF or simply eat less of all kinds of foods. You obviously
    don't understand why that doesn't work.

    Self-control and personal responsibility work for everyone. You just have to
    stop the excuses and move on.

  6. self control is not in the reach of everyone, which is the point of this
    thread.
    the human brain has many permutations, and some individuals have
    pathological deficits in self control with respect to food.

    more to the point many of us in this forum are somewhere north of this
    extreme, where self control is indeed theoretically possible, but much more
    difficult than it is for other people. to ignore this is to ignore the
    population segment models that have enabled medicine to move forward for the
    last 40 years. One solution does not fit all.

    "The Low-Carb Bartender" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:sj5wd.505512$wV.412289@attbi_s54...

    Quoted message said:


    "> If moderation worked for everyone, then none of us would really need
    LC, we

    Quoted message said:

    could just do LF or simply eat less of all kinds of foods. You obviously
    don't understand why that doesn't work.

    Self-control and personal responsibility work for everyone. You just have
    to stop the excuses and move on.

  7. Yet the military can make one size fit all, and be very successful at doing
    so.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    self control is not in the reach of everyone, which is the point of this
    thread.
    the human brain has many permutations, and some individuals have
    pathological deficits in self control with respect to food.

    more to the point many of us in this forum are somewhere north of this
    extreme, where self control is indeed theoretically possible, but much
    more difficult than it is for other people. to ignore this is to ignore
    the population segment models that have enabled medicine to move forward
    for the last 40 years. One solution does not fit all.

    "The Low-Carb Bartender" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:sj5wd.505512$wV.412289@attbi_s54...

    Quoted message said:


    "> If moderation worked for everyone, then none of us would really need
    LC, we

    Quoted message said:

    could just do LF or simply eat less of all kinds of foods. You
    obviously
    don't understand why that doesn't work.

    Self-control and personal responsibility work for everyone. You just have
    to stop the excuses and move on.

  8. you are apparently acquainted with a different military than me....I have
    never known them to fit anything well.

    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yet the military can make one size fit all, and be very successful at
    doing so.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    self control is not in the reach of everyone, which is the point of this
    thread.
    the human brain has many permutations, and some individuals have
    pathological deficits in self control with respect to food.

    more to the point many of us in this forum are somewhere north of this
    extreme, where self control is indeed theoretically possible, but much
    more difficult than it is for other people. to ignore this is to ignore
    the population segment models that have enabled medicine to move forward
    for the last 40 years. One solution does not fit all.

    "The Low-Carb Bartender" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:sj5wd.505512$wV.412289@attbi_s54...

    Quoted message said:


    "> If moderation worked for everyone, then none of us would really need
    LC, we
    > could just do LF or simply eat less of all kinds of foods. You
    > obviously
    > don't understand why that doesn't work.

    Self-control and personal responsibility work for everyone. You just
    have to stop the excuses and move on.

  9. Then you have never known them.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    you are apparently acquainted with a different military than me....I have
    never known them to fit anything well.

    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yet the military can make one size fit all, and be very successful at
    doing so.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    self control is not in the reach of everyone, which is the point of this
    thread.
    the human brain has many permutations, and some individuals have
    pathological deficits in self control with respect to food.

    more to the point many of us in this forum are somewhere north of this
    extreme, where self control is indeed theoretically possible, but much
    more difficult than it is for other people. to ignore this is to ignore
    the population segment models that have enabled medicine to move forward
    for the last 40 years. One solution does not fit all.

    "The Low-Carb Bartender" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:sj5wd.505512$wV.412289@attbi_s54...
    >
    > "> If moderation worked for everyone, then none of us would really need
    > LC, we
    >> could just do LF or simply eat less of all kinds of foods. You
    >> obviously
    >> don't understand why that doesn't work.
    >
    > Self-control and personal responsibility work for everyone. You just
    > have to stop the excuses and move on.
    >

  10. bob wrote:
    || nothing changes permamently, except death, and even that has
    || phases....(having worked next door to the autopsy room, you learn a
    || lot of weird stuff....)

    eww.....you can keep that to yourself :

    ||
    || therefore to say nothing changed is to deny the word has meaning.
    || Losing weight, even for a month is a change. It may not be that
    || significant, but it is more significant than someone who never lost
    || weight, and does not even know it is possible.

    Exactly.

    ||
    || "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    || news:[email hidden]...
    ||| bob wrote:
    ||||| It would be inaccurate to say nothing changed. Something did
    ||||| change (weight, waistlines). the problem seems to be that
    ||||| behaviors and habits did not change.
    |||
    ||| They did not change permanently. Old habits die hard....

  11. JC Der Koenig wrote:
    || Yet the military can make one size fit all, and be very successful
    || at doing so.

    Interesting. How many military people lost 100 lbs during basic training?

  12. demonstrably false.

    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Then you have never known them.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    you are apparently acquainted with a different military than me....I have
    never known them to fit anything well.

    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Yet the military can make one size fit all, and be very successful at
    doing so.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > self control is not in the reach of everyone, which is the point of
    > this thread.
    > the human brain has many permutations, and some individuals have
    > pathological deficits in self control with respect to food.
    >
    > more to the point many of us in this forum are somewhere north of this
    > extreme, where self control is indeed theoretically possible, but much
    > more difficult than it is for other people. to ignore this is to ignore
    > the population segment models that have enabled medicine to move
    > forward for the last 40 years. One solution does not fit all.
    >
    >
    > "The Low-Carb Bartender" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:sj5wd.505512$wV.412289@attbi_s54...
    >>
    >> "> If moderation worked for everyone, then none of us would really
    >> need LC, we
    >>> could just do LF or simply eat less of all kinds of foods. You
    >>> obviously
    >>> don't understand why that doesn't work.
    >>
    >> Self-control and personal responsibility work for everyone. You just
    >> have to stop the excuses and move on.
    >>
    >
    >

  13. On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:03:25 -0500, Roger Zoul <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    JC Der Koenig wrote:
    :: "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    :: news:[email hidden]...
    ::: JC Der Koenig wrote:
    ::::: Yet the military can make one size fit all, and be very successful
    ::::: at doing so.

    The military never molded me into their ideal (which is why I got out at
    the earliest opportunity).

    --
    Bob in CT

  14. Nothing "of consequence" really changed.

    bob said:

    It would be inaccurate to say nothing changed. Something did change (weight,
    waistlines). the problem seems to be that behaviors and habits did not
    change.

    "MU" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom said:

    Yes, almost everyone I personally know that had lost the weight on
    lo-carb, ended up going back to the old habits. The diet works great. It
    seems that eating this way for the long term is the difficult part.

    That's because nothing really changed.

  15. "Ignoramus5102" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom said:


    "Ignoramus3578" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:42:09 GMT, Tom <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > "Ignoramus3578" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 19:15:19 GMT, Tom <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> My acid reflux went away as soon as I started eating less, even


    before

    Quoted message said:

    >> >> low carbing, but it took going low carb to get rid of knee pain.
    >> >
    >> > Perhaps the amount of benefits plays a major role in whether a
    > person
    >> > decides to change lifestyle for the rest of their life.
    >>
    >> I do not yet know if I will keep this lifestyle for the rest of my
    >> life; I will only keep it for as long as it makes sense.
    >
    > I definitely agree. If for some reason it is proven that the way


    I'm

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > eating is dangerous, I would not hesitate to change my diet. Despite


    vastly

    Quoted message said:

    > different opinions about the diet, I don't see any evidence of it


    being

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > harmful. So far, I have only seen good health from it. I can't see


    going

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > back to eating large amounts of junk food no matter what the change


    would be

    Quoted message said:

    > in the end though. Time will tell.

    I am wondering if you are familiar with personality typing and whether
    you read Keirsey's Please Understand Me II. Specifically, do you think
    that you belong to the Rational category.

    part. Even though some on this board may not feel that I am rational at
    times bacause I don't always agree with what they say. 🙂

    I asked that questoin because your decision making process was
    entirely rational and suggestiive of yuor personality.

    You seem to be as well. Perhaps that is why I find many of your posts
    interesting.
    Tom

    Quoted message said:


    --
    223/172.4/180

  16. "Ignoramus5102" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Tom said:


    I am still on low carb, but there is a lot of peer pressure to relax
    about my Nazi-like attitude about it. I think that if I relax too much,


    I'll

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    go back to eating too much because of hunger.

    If you go off LC, and want to control your weight, you must limit how
    much you eat.

    Yes. I would then have to count calories.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    But you are right, if I do
    ever decide that eating at an increased carb level causes hunger to be


    too

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    unpleasant I could always become more strict.

    Yes. Experiment with adding carbs from vegs first. Add them slowly.
    Otherwise it is too easy to lose control, as others report.

    My recent choice has been the inclusion of beans and lentils in limited
    amounts because of the higher fiber values. I like to also cut up a carrot
    into a 2 to 3 day supply of salad veggies. Basically what ever I'm adding is
    balanced by carbs verses nutrient value. I also intend to eat manderine
    oranges as my dessert during this holiday season. I'll have to try and limit
    what I include because I also want to see if these additions have any affect
    on my former problems of shoulder joint pain(minor), and acid reflux.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Recently I have included beans occasionally to my list of allowable
    foods. Our homemade chili does not look like regular chili, as the


    amount of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    beans is small. It is largely chunks of cut up steak or roast with some
    added onions, celery, and green pepper, spices and A1 steak sauce,


    tomato

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    sauce. I try to add little amounts of any higher carb item and see if


    there

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    is any noticable affect in new recipes.
    The amounts that are included still don't satisfy what my friends


    would

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    consider a reasonable diet.

    Are your friends naturally thin, still fat, or thin because they lost
    weight? Unless they are the latter, they will not understand you. I
    would not try too hard to satisfy them, and, also, they will respect
    you if you stick to your guns.

    I am the slimmer than most everyone in my age range(46). These guys have
    basically tried all the weightloss diets without success and have basically
    concluded that this is there fate. They do understand about calories in and
    out and the value of exercise, but find it too hard to stick with any plan.
    The few that have tried lo-carb have resumed their former diets and the
    weight has come back. There is only one other guy in my age category that
    remains successful, actually 2 years longer than me. He only discusses the
    diet with me because I am in agreement. His problem is similar to mine. He
    will eat more carbs at work, while at home he eats more strict. I can see
    why he is doing it this way.
    The younger guys I would have thought to be more open about it. But they
    are more naturally thin and don't understand about trying to lose weight. Of
    course, it's because they are young and don't have those problems yet. I was
    just like them at a younger age. If someone would have told me that I would
    be 30lbs heavier in 10 years, I would have howled with laughter.
    I believe that in another 10 years, these guys will go through the same
    thing. Hopefully I will still be at goal weight at that time and can be of
    help to them then.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    It is still to obvious to them that I am eating
    lo-carb.

    So, you are slim, healthy, lost weight, and eating low carb. Sounds
    good to me.

    It seems odd to me that on one hand a person could say, "Hey you look
    great", and aknowledge the health benefits. Then the next day say that the
    style of eating is wrong and be concerned about my long term health. Do they
    think I'm trading good health benefits now for worse health later?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    The problem really, is that I feel I am eating properly, but
    everyone else thinks that their high carb diet is the best.

    Maybe it is the best, for them.

    It was for me, until I got fat.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Of course, I am one of the slimmest among them but that doesn't
    matter. I think that the only way to show them is to continue as
    long as there are no side affects, and show them that my weight is
    stable over a period of a few years. I can not blame anyone who is
    skeptical as there is a lot of conflicting data on just about
    anything you can think of. I myself am like that as well. I like to
    see proof rather than follow blindly.

    I agree here.

    Quoted message said:

    So far the lo-carb style of eating has shown me that lots of people


    can

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    be led to believe whatever is spoonfed to them. The fact that high carb


    has

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    been touted for so long is evidence of that. Any disagreement with what


    they

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    have been taught can cause anger rather than curiosity.

    That's normal.

    Quoted message said:

    I am a little
    different. If someone can provide good evidence for a case, I am more
    inclined to at least hear the story and try and look up facts to see if


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    is plausible. Some of the people that I have talked to about lo-carb can
    only repeat the bad things they have heard about it. When asked why they
    think pastas, white bread, rice, sugar, and potatoes are necessary and


    what

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    vitamins and nutrients they get out of them, they can't think of a good
    reason. When I try to explain about their affect on blood sugar and


    insulin

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    spikes, it falls on deaf ears. Most people only rely on what is heard in


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    news media, or tend to think the food pyramid is the ultimate guide.


    Sorry,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I've been rambling much longer than I thought. I'll close it off here.

    I think that after a while, your friends may learn something from you.

    Other than peer pressure to conform, I have no problems at all with the
    diet. Your right. They can learn from me, but I will have to set an example
    and wait a few years. They have agreed that all the sugar they were eating
    was not good. I think as they gain weight in the future, they will remember
    my experiences. Talk is cheap. It's results that everyone wants to see.
    Tom

    Quoted message said:

    --
    223/172.4/180

  17. Roger Zoul said:

    Interesting. How many military people lost 100 lbs during basic training?

    Zero.

  18. Bob Mauri said:

    The military never molded me into their ideal (which is why I got out at
    the earliest opportunity).

    Same here.

  19. Wrong.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    demonstrably false.

    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Then you have never known them.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    you are apparently acquainted with a different military than me....I
    have never known them to fit anything well.

    "JC Der Koenig" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > Yet the military can make one size fit all, and be very successful at
    > doing so.
    >
    > --
    > You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus
    >
    >
    > "bob" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> self control is not in the reach of everyone, which is the point of
    >> this thread.
    >> the human brain has many permutations, and some individuals have
    >> pathological deficits in self control with respect to food.
    >>
    >> more to the point many of us in this forum are somewhere north of this
    >> extreme, where self control is indeed theoretically possible, but much
    >> more difficult than it is for other people. to ignore this is to
    >> ignore the population segment models that have enabled medicine to
    >> move forward for the last 40 years. One solution does not fit all.
    >>
    >>
    >> "The Low-Carb Bartender" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    >> news:sj5wd.505512$wV.412289@attbi_s54...
    >>>
    >>> "> If moderation worked for everyone, then none of us would really
    >>> need LC, we
    >>>> could just do LF or simply eat less of all kinds of foods. You
    >>>> obviously
    >>>> don't understand why that doesn't work.
    >>>
    >>> Self-control and personal responsibility work for everyone. You just
    >>> have to stop the excuses and move on.
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >

  20. I'm sure they begged you to stay.

    --
    You're too dumb to even be a troll trainee. -- Cereus-validus

    "Bob Mauri" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:03:25 -0500, Roger Zoul <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    JC Der Koenig wrote:
    :: "Roger Zoul" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    :: news:[email hidden]...
    ::: JC Der Koenig wrote:
    ::::: Yet the military can make one size fit all, and be very successful
    ::::: at doing so.

    The military never molded me into their ideal (which is why I got out at
    the earliest opportunity).

    --
    Bob in CT

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.