Whats the real deal with wax-based chain lubes being touted as the new hotness, while oil-based lubes are seemingly getting left in the dust? I mean, Ive heard wax lubes are cleaner, more efficient, and better in dry conditions, but are they really worth the extra hassle and cost? And what about the claims that oil-based lubes are better in wet conditions - is that just a myth perpetuated by old-school cyclists?
Are wax lubes really that much better at repelling dirt and grime, or is it just a matter of them being more finicky to apply? And whats the deal with the whole wax lubes dont attract dirt thing - doesnt that just mean theyre not doing their job as well? Ive heard some people say that wax lubes are more prone to wearing off quickly, which would negate any potential benefits.
Can someone break down the actual science behind how these two types of lubes work, and what the real-world implications are for us cyclists? I want to know if Im just being a dinosaur for sticking with my trusty old oil-based lube, or if theres really something to this wax-based craze.
Are wax lubes really that much better at repelling dirt and grime, or is it just a matter of them being more finicky to apply? And whats the deal with the whole wax lubes dont attract dirt thing - doesnt that just mean theyre not doing their job as well? Ive heard some people say that wax lubes are more prone to wearing off quickly, which would negate any potential benefits.
Can someone break down the actual science behind how these two types of lubes work, and what the real-world implications are for us cyclists? I want to know if Im just being a dinosaur for sticking with my trusty old oil-based lube, or if theres really something to this wax-based craze.