Road Cycling · Public discussion

the bike industry

Started by loki · · Last activity · 2 posts · 287 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 September 2004
Last activity
9 September 2004
Original author
loki
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
287
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040907/RTRADE07//?query=china+bicycle

    Globe & Mail, 7/9/4, [Asian menace? or the glories of the WTO?]

    'OTTAWA - Canadian bicycle makers fear a big jump in rival Chinese imports
    after Ottawa cleared the way last week for the communist country to ship
    cheaper products here without incurring anti-dumping duties.'
    [...]
    'That's because Ottawa has decided to stop treating China as a so-called
    non-market economy riddled with government intervention and subsidies.
    (China recently joined the World Trade Organization and has been lobbying
    other countries to win market economy status.)

    'But Ottawa's new approach means it's using data directly from Chinese
    manufacturers, who operate extremely leanly, to verify these Asian producers
    are not dumping bikes below cost of production in Canada.'
    [...]
    'Michael Flavell, a lawyer for some Canadian bike makers, said Ottawa's
    move could force companies to shutter bike assembly operations here and
    instead switch to importing them in order to stay competitive.

    He said Canada is "totally out of step with our trading partners" by
    treating China as a market economy.'
    [...]
    'Peter Clark, a trade consultant working for a major Chinese bike importer,
    rejected suggestions Canada has set a precedent by according China market
    economy status. Other countries have done this too, he says.'

    --
    'Do as you damn well please
    Or you could end up
    being a pot-bellied boring hairless fart'
    - billy connelly

  2. In article
    <[email hidden]>,

    loki said:

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040907/RTRADE07//?query=china+bicycle

    Globe & Mail, 7/9/4, [Asian menace? or the glories of the WTO?]

    'OTTAWA - Canadian bicycle makers fear a big jump in rival Chinese imports
    after Ottawa cleared the way last week for the communist country to ship
    cheaper products here without incurring anti-dumping duties.'
    [...]
    'That's because Ottawa has decided to stop treating China as a so-called
    non-market economy riddled with government intervention and subsidies.
    (China recently joined the World Trade Organization and has been lobbying
    other countries to win market economy status.)

    'But Ottawa's new approach means it's using data directly from Chinese
    manufacturers, who operate extremely leanly, to verify these Asian producers
    are not dumping bikes below cost of production in Canada.'
    [...]
    'Michael Flavell, a lawyer for some Canadian bike makers, said Ottawa's
    move could force companies to shutter bike assembly operations here and
    instead switch to importing them in order to stay competitive.

    The two bike "assemblers" mentioned in the story are Procycle (Rocky
    Mountain, Oryx, CCM, and other brands high and low) and Raleigh Canada.

    Assembler generally means bolting frames made in Taiwan to components
    made in Malaysia in the comfort of a Canadian plant. This is not a bad
    thing! But I would be surprised if low-end bikes from these companies
    even get such treatment. I'm pretty sure almost every CCM on the market
    would be fully built up in Taiwan.

    Chinese-assembled bikes don't really affect the LBS market (except as
    another data point for customers who come into the shop, see
    full-suspension bikes selling for $1800, and figure they should just buy
    the $200 one at Canadian Tire), because I don't know of any Chinese-made
    (as opposed to Taiwanese) bikes making it to LBS floors.

    The future probably does mean that more and higher-end bike frames will
    be built in China. Right now Taiwan is in the same boat Japan was 20
    years ago: a maker of high-quality frames with cost-control issues
    compared to a cheaper competitor across the water. Except Japan was
    looking at Taiwan, and Taiwan is looking at China.

    So for now, Wal-Mart bikes will get even cheaper, and eventually Norco
    and Procycle and Raleigh will probably start moving more production to
    China, and Taiwan will have some interesting times as they get pushed
    into higher-end bike making, maybe even putting pressure on some
    domestic makers in Europe and North America (Rocky Mountain, for
    example, still touts the fact that its bike frames are made in Canada).

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com
    Verus de parvis; verus de magnis.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.