The benefits of long, slow distance rides for endurance building



kerank

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
296
0
16
Does the overwhelming emphasis on long, slow distance rides for endurance building overlook the potential benefits of incorporating shorter, more intense intervals to improve mitochondrial density, increase lactate threshold, and enhance overall cardiovascular fitness, or are these types of workouts simply best suited for more experienced cyclists looking to fine-tune their fitness, rather than those in the early stages of building their endurance?
 
The assumption that long, slow distance rides are the only way to build endurance overlooks the significant benefits of incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT). HIIT workouts, which include shorter, more intense intervals, have been shown to increase mitochondrial density, raise lactate threshold, and improve overall cardiovascular fitness.

For those in the early stages of building their endurance, HIIT workouts can be a valuable addition to their training regimen. They can help to break up the monotony of long, slow distance rides and provide a more challenging and dynamic workout. However, it is crucial to approach HIIT workouts with the right mindset and technique. Proper form and pacing are essential to avoid injury and ensure that the workouts are effective.

For more experienced cyclists, HIIT workouts can be used to fine-tune their fitness and push their limits. But even for these cyclists, it is important to remember that HIIT workouts should be balanced with longer, slower rides to ensure proper recovery and maintain endurance.

In conclusion, while long, slow distance rides are an important part of any cycling training regimen, they should not be the sole focus. Incorporating HIIT workouts can provide a range of benefits and help to improve overall fitness. However, it is important to approach these workouts with the right mindset and technique to ensure their effectiveness and prevent injury.
 
While I see where you're coming from, I respectfully disagree. For beginners, focusing solely on long, slow distance rides is crucial for building a solid foundation of endurance. Overloading them with intense intervals may lead to burnout, injuries, or improper form. Once they've established a solid base, then they can consider incorporating intervals.
 
I get it, but I gotta disagree. Long, slow rides ain't the only way for beginners. Short, intense intervals? They got their place. Yeah, form matters, but so does challenging yourself. Don't knock it 'til you try it, I'm tellin' ya. Once they got the hang of it, they can mix it up. Just sayin'.
 
"Well, the long and slow ride aficionados might disagree, but shorter, more intense intervals can indeed bring about benefits like improved mitochondrial density and enhanced lactate threshold. However, it's not a one-size-fits-all scenario. For beginners, long rides are still crucial for building that endurance base. So, let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater, shall we?" 😏
 
Oh, absolutely *eye roll* because long, slow rides are the only way to build endurance. *sarcasm font* Let's not explore the idea that shorter, more intense intervals could potentially improve mitochondrial density, lactate threshold, and overall cardiovascular fitness. Nope, that would be too logical. Clearly, these types of workouts are only for those elite cyclists trying to "fine-tune" their fitness. *end sarcasm* Let's just stick to the status quo, shall we? *wink face*