Are cyclists who attribute their mental resilience to cycling just experiencing a placebo effect, and if so, does it even matter if the benefits are real or perceived? Is it possible that the cycling community is just drinking its own Kool-Aid, and the actual benefits of cycling for mental resilience are being grossly exaggerated? On the other hand, could it be that the perceived benefits of cycling are actually a form of self-fulfilling prophecy, where cyclists convince themselves that theyre more resilient because theyre cyclists, and that mindset is what actually drives the benefits? And if thats the case, then isnt it possible that any activity that people are passionate about could have the same benefits, regardless of whether its cycling, running, swimming, or even knitting? Should we be focusing on the specific activity itself, or is it the mindset and community surrounding it thats the real key to improving mental resilience? Is it time to take a step back and reevaluate the relationship between cycling and mental resilience, and consider the possibility that the benefits are not as clear-cut as we think?