rec.sport.unicycling archive · Public discussion

Thank you!

Started by Fritz Lott · · Last activity · 4 posts · 800 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling archive
Published
2 April 2004
Last activity
2 April 2004
Original author
Fritz Lott
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
800
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Thank you for your comments! Inspirational!
    --
    Fritz Lott
    220 Sunnyridge Lane
    Golden Valley, MN 55422-5300

  2. Fritz Lott said:


    Thank you for your comments! Inspirational!
    --
    Fritz Lott 220 Sunnyridge Lane Golden Valley, MN 55422-5300

    This post ended up wrongly in the spam bin. But it isn't
    spam. For the benefit of those who responded to the original
    question by Fritz, I'll reply to this Thank you! post which
    should put it back on the forum.

    Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict
    --
    I have a feeling you might need two points of contact with
    the ground for such a thing to work? Or at least training
    wheels on the front and rear. - John Foss commenting on a
    picture of a one-wheeled vehicle he saw on RSU.

  3. My apologies. I sent it to spam because it was unlinked to
    any other thread and, as such, had no real content. I will
    not trash this thread although, as it is not linked to any
    other, also has no real content.

    --
    harper - Old dog, no tricks

    -Greg Harper

    B L U E S H I F T

    "In the unlikely event of someones unicycling demise, one should say 'It
    was an amazing display of unicycling skill and daring, with a rather
    unfortunate outcome'. Or something to that effect. - Scott Wallis

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    harper's Profile: unicyclist.com426
    View this thread: unicyclist.com30148

  4. harper said:

    My apologies. I sent it to spam because it was unlinked to
    any other thread and, as such, had no real content. I will
    not trash this thread although, as it is not linked to any
    other, also has no real content.

    I reply risking to post 'no content'. I (for one) accept the
    apology, but I disagree with Ol' Harper about the 'no
    content'. The original posted asked a valid question, got a
    lot of useful response and then posted to espress his
    gratitude. That's real content to me. And not linking to any
    other thread is not indicative of lack of content either,
    most threads start unlinked to any other.

    If you want to spamdump all the posts with /really/ no
    content you would have a day's job.

    Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict
    --
    I have a feeling you might need two points of contact with
    the ground for such a thing to work? Or at least training
    wheels on the front and rear. - John Foss commenting on a
    picture of a one-wheeled vehicle he saw on RSU.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.