Power meters · Public discussion

Tabata's vs tradtional VO2 sets

Started by Hockey-cyclist · · Last activity · 3 posts · 1,256 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Power meters
Published
23 December 2010
Last activity
23 December 2010
Original author
Hockey-cyclist
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,256
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Ok...I've done Tabata intervals. I have done sets of 8. Yeah they are tough. However, how on earth can they be better, or even close to better, than 5X 5 VO2 traditional VO2 max intervals. I am talking about improvements in VO2 max here. I'll tell you what, I'd do Tabata's any day over 5 X 5 or 3 X 7 or any other combo of traditional VO2's. Why, because they are easier. That's my opinion and yes I did the Tabata's absolutely balls out. In my opinion there is nothing tougher than 5 X 5 on the trainer.

    Also, in the Tabata study the dudes only started with about a 50 VO2 max...hardly trained athletes in my opinion. Surely the fact that the people in the study were not that well trained has something to do with the success of the Tabata's.

    Boy. I'd like to hear from Dr. Coggan on this one.

  2. I have not done tabata intervals, so I cannot really speak to their pros/cons. However, my reason for not doing them is that my coaches are advocates of traditional VO2 intervals, and I do what they say since it seems to be working :-)

  3. Depends on what your goals are. QA also helps to explain why/when Tabatas might be more appropriate than traditional L5 work.

    Dave

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.