CyclingForums
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
UK and Europe · Public discussion
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Spotted the following in Hansard of March 28 that may give some comfort
to users of SWT
"The franchise replacement process provides an opportunity to improve
cycle facilities at stations, and to address the requirements of
cyclists who wish to use trains. Bidders for the imminent South Western
franchise will be asked to consider cycle-rail integration matters in
their bid submissions."
--
Tony
"The best way I know of to win an argument is to start by being in the
right."
- Lord Hailsham
Tony Raven said:Spotted the following in Hansard of March 28 that may give some comfort
to users of SWT"The franchise replacement process provides an opportunity to improve
cycle facilities at stations, and to address the requirements of
cyclists who wish to use trains. Bidders for the imminent South Western
franchise will be asked to consider cycle-rail integration matters in
their bid submissions."
A couple more Sheffield stands then :-(
John B
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:02:26 +0100 someone who may be Tony Raven
<[email hidden]> wrote this:-
Quoted message said:"Bidders for the imminent South Western
franchise will be asked to consider cycle-rail integration matters in
their bid submissions."
They will say that they have considered it, it is all too difficult
and they are going to ban all non-folding bikes.
--
David Hansen, Edinburgh
I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.