General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

sun moon feb26 to 27 05. trig

Started by Trio Funingtrain · · Last activity · 3 posts · 275 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
27 February 2005
Last activity
28 February 2005
Original author
Trio Funingtrain
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
275
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Sun Moon this a.m. trigonometry.

    Group: rec.running Date: Sat, Feb 26, 2005, 8:57am From:
    [email hidden] (Trio Funingtrain)
    Date: Sat, Feb 26, 2005, 8:03am To: [email hidden] Subject: sun
    moon
    standing by my weight lifting area and backyard sky gazer point.
    View from Sun: 148130517 km above 8°33'S 10°7'W
    .......................................
    around equator
      View from Moon: 386240 km above 0°19'S 164°26'W
    .....................................
    centre: 42°20'N 83°3'W, width 15 degrees Dtetroit Michigan

    From: [email hidden](Trio Funingtrain) Date: Sun, Feb 27, 2005,
    7:58am To: [email hidden] Subject: sun moon from Feb 26 to Feb 27
    2005.
    View from Sun: 148165851 km above 8°11'S 9°5'W
    View from Moon: 382859 km above 6°17'S 152°32'W
    Satellite data provided by The Living Earth® Inc./Earth Imaging ©
    1996, All Rights Reserved.
    differents=
    moon=3381.km
    sun=35334km
    moon=6°2'S 11°52' W
    sun=0°22' S 1°2'W

    So from eye view at wtg lift sky gaze backyard sky watcher North of
    Detroit Michigan

    moon was south some
    sun was north some
    and at 14816593km 8d11m S 4d28m W 12:30:35 to
    14816592km 8d11m S 7d29 W 12:42:40
    +5 est, or 7:42 est time

    The sun is moveing West

  2. 1 leg man said 10 miles a day
    as of feb 26/2005 mine is 10.14+ a day
    today feb 27 2005 I still here.

    proff as the world turns.
    So as I have 2 legs and most here in rr do.

    I can say at warm up time still:
    10.14 miles × 57 days is well a head in race of 1 leg man at 10 miles
    a day saids:

    proff. if interested=
    I post. most in michigan do not.
    time to ride soon. KYA

    like being :Haveing your ass kick in miles by a one legged man is too
    say.

    How can you look at your self and be with out shame.........

    Kepler's laws of planetary motion
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

    Johannes Kepler's primary contributions to astronomy/astrophysics
    were the three laws of planetary motion. Kepler derived these laws, in
    part, by studying the observations of Brahe. Isaac Newton would later
    design his laws of motion and universal gravitation and verify that
    Kepler's laws could be derived from them. The generic term for an
    orbiting object is "satellite".

    Contents [showhide]
    1 Kepler's laws of planetary motion
    2 Kepler's first law
    2.1 Connection with Newton's laws
    3 Kepler's second law
    3.1 Proof of Kepler's second law:
    4 Kepler's third law (harmonic law)
    5 Applicability
    6 Application
    7 Kepler's understanding of the laws
    8 See also
    [edit]
    Kepler's laws of planetary motion

    Kepler's first law (1609): The orbit of a planet about a star is an
    ellipse with the star at one focus.

    Kepler's second law (1609): A line joining a planet and its star sweeps
    out equal areas during equal intervals of time.

    Kepler's third law (1618): The square of the sidereal period of an
    orbiting planet is directly proportional to the cube of the orbit's
    semimajor axis.

    [edit]
    Kepler's first law
    The orbit of a planet about a star is an ellipse with the star at one
    focus.
    There is no object at the other focus of a planet's orbit. The semimajor
    axis, a, is the average distance between the planet and its star.

    [edit]
    Connection with Newton's laws
    Newton proposed that "every object in the universe attracts every other
    object along a line of the centers of the objects proportional to each
    objects mass, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance
    between the objects."

    This section proves that Kepler's first law is consistent with Newton's
    laws of motion. We begin with Newton's law F=ma:
    Here we express F as the product of its magnitude and its direction.
    Recall that in polar coordinates:

    In component form we have:
    Now consider the angular momentum:
    So:
    where is the angular momentum per unit mass. Now we substitute. Let:
    The equation of motion in the direction becomes:
    Newton's law of gravitation states that the central force is inversely
    proportional to the square of the distance so we have:
    where k is our proportionality constant.
    This differential equation has the general solution:
    Replacing u with r and letting ?0=0:
    ..
    This is indeed the equation of a conic section with the origin at one
    focus. Q.E.D.

    [edit]
    Kepler's second law
    A line joining a planet and its star sweeps out equal areas during equal
    intervals of time.
    This is also known as the law of equal areas. Suppose a planet takes 1
    day to travel from points A to B. During this time, an imaginary line,
    from the Sun to the planet, will sweep out a roughly triangular area.
    This same amount of area will be swept every day.
    As a planet travels in its elliptical orbit, its distance from the Sun
    will vary. As an equal area is swept during any period of time and since
    the distance from a planet to its orbiting star varies, one can conclude
    that in order for the area being swept to remain constant, a planet must
    vary in velocity. Planets move fastest when at perihelion and slowest
    when at aphelion.
    This law was developed, in part, from the observations of Brahe that
    indicated that the velocity of planets was not constant.
    This law corresponds to the angular momentum conservation law in the
    given situation.

    [edit]
    Proof of Kepler's second law:
    Assuming Newton's laws of motion, we can show that Kepler's second law
    is consistent. By definition, the angular momentum of a point mass with
    mass m and velocity is :
    ..
    where is the position vector of the particle.
    Since , we have:
    taking the time derivative of both sides:
    since the cross product of parallel vectors is 0. We can now say that
    is constant.
    The area swept out by the line joining the planet and the sun, is half
    the area of the parallelogram formed by and .

    Since is constant, the area swept out by is also constant. Q.E.D.

    [edit]
    Kepler's third law (harmonic law)
    The square of the sidereal period of an orbiting planet is directly
    proportional to the cube of the orbit's semimajor axis.
    P2 ~ a3
    P = object's sidereal period in years
    a = object's semimajor axis, in AU
    Thus, not only does the length of the orbit increase with distance, also
    the orbital speed decreases, so that the increase of the sidereal period
    is more than proportional.

    See the actual figures: attributes of major planets.
    Newton would modify this third law, noting that the period is also
    affected by the orbiting body's mass, however typically the central body
    is so much more massive that the orbiting body's mass may be ignored.
    (See below.)

    [edit]
    Applicability
    The laws are applicable whenever a comparatively light object revolves
    around a much heavier one because of gravitational attraction. It is
    assumed that the gravitational effect of the lighter object on the
    heavier one is negligible. An example is the case of a satellite
    revolving around Earth.

    [edit]
    Application
    Assume an orbit with semimajor axis a, semiminor axis b, and
    eccentricity ?. To convert the laws into predictions, Kepler began by
    adding the orbit's auxiliary circle (that with the major axis as a
    diameter) and defined these points:
    c center of auxiliary circle and ellipse
    s sun (at one focus of ellipse);
    p the planet
    z perihelion
    x is the projection of the planet to the auxiliary circle; then
    y is a point on the circle such that
    and three angles measured from perihelion:
    true anomaly , the planet as seen from the sun
    eccentric anomaly , x as seen from the centre
    mean anomaly , y as seen from the centre
    Then
    area cxz = area cxs + area sxz = area cxs + area cyz
    giving Kepler's equation
    ..
    To connect E and T, assume r = length sp then
    and rsinT = bsinE

    which is ambiguous but useable. A better form follows by some trickery
    with trigonometric identities:

    (So far only laws of geometry have been used.)
    Note that area spz is the area swept since perihelion; by the second
    law, that is proportional to time since perihelion. But we defined and
    so M is also proportional to time since perihelion—this is why it was
    introduced.
    We now have a connection between time and position in the orbit. The
    catch is that Kepler's equation cannot be rearranged to isolate E; going
    in the time-to-position direction requires an iteration (such as
    Newton's method) or an approximate expression, such as
    via the Lagrange reversion theorem. For the small ? typical of the
    planets (except Pluto) such series are quite accurate with only a few
    terms; one could even develop a series computing T directly from
    M.[1] (http://info.ifpan.edu.pl/firststep/aw-works/fsII/mul/mueller.html)

    [edit]
    Kepler's understanding of the laws
    Kepler did not understand why his laws were correct; it was Isaac Newton
    who discovered the answer to this more than fifty years later. Newton,
    understanding that his third law of motion was related to Kepler's third
    law of planetary motion, devised the following:
    where:
    P = object's sidereal period
    a = object's semimajor axis
    G = 6.67 × 10?11 N · m2/kg2 = the gravitational constant
    m1 = mass of object 1
    m2 = mass of object 2
    ? = mathematical constant pi

    Astronomers doing celestial mechanics often use units of years, AU, G=1,
    and solar masses, and with m2<<m1, this reduces to Kepler's form. SI
    units may also be used directly in this

  3. That's all backyard science. No facts or truth to it at all.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.