David W.E. Roberts said:I am finding that spare layers tend to take up too much space when packed
in and on my small back pack.
A stuffsac doesn't necessarily help /that/ much unless it's compressing
the item a fair bit. Since the rucksack itself is bag you might as well
use /it/ and the other contents to do the compression. Another problem
of stuffsacs is they make all your things into basically cylinders,
which don't necessarily fill space as well as jackets etc. just stuffed
into crannies.
Quoted message said:I also carry my waterproof strapped underneath my pack, where it tends to
get dirty quite quickly.
Stuff it between a fully waterproof liner and the actual rucksack wall.
That way it will stay clean and won't get anything wet, will be easy
to locate, and since it'll be basically flat and compressed by the bag's
other contents it will fill space more effectively than if you put it in
a wee bag.
Quoted message said:Plastic carrier bags aren't suitable because I need to be able to compress
the clothing then tightly fix the neck of the sack.
Another approach is just put a webbing strap with a ladderlock buckle
around them. Stuffsacs only strike me as a major win for highly
compressible kit like downies and sleeping bags. Otherwise they're as
much organisational as anything else, and stuff like fleece pullovers
can generally just be squeezed in at the bottom to compress them
reasonably effectively anyway. Also, stuffsacs really have to be sized
for the item in question to optimise the packing volume, as opposed to
just the organisation side (i.e., "all my toiletries should be in the
wee orange bag" rather than "they're in this 40 litre bag /somewhere/"😉.
I find the organisational side is genuinely useful, but it doesn't
address your problem, particularly.
Pete.
--
Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer
Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital
Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK
net [email hidden] http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/