Whats the point of even discussing strength training for cyclists if the majority of you roadies are just going to ignore the most obvious exercises that actually improve cadence? Its laughable how many of you are still stuck on the idea that cadence is solely dependent on cardiovascular fitness and bike fit. Newsflash: its not.
Instead of wasting your time with fancy plyometric exercises and functional training, why not focus on the basics? Whats the evidence to support the idea that exercises like single-leg squats, step-ups, and calf raises actually improve pedaling efficiency and cadence? And no, I dont want to hear about some anecdotal study from a small group of amateur riders. I want to see real data from reputable sources.
Furthermore, how do you reconcile the fact that many elite cyclists have relatively low strength levels compared to other athletes, yet are still able to maintain incredibly high cadences? Is it possible that the relationship between strength and cadence is more complex than we think?
And what about the role of neural adaptations in improving cadence? We all know that the nervous system plays a huge role in controlling movement patterns, so why do we always focus on the muscular aspects of strength training? Are there specific exercises or training protocols that can help improve neural drive and muscle recruitment patterns, leading to faster and more efficient pedaling?
Lastly, can we please stop pretending that strength training is a supplemental aspect of cycling training? Its not. Strength training should be a fundamental component of any cyclists training program, and its time we start treating it as such. So, lets get real and talk about the actual exercises and training protocols that can help improve cadence, rather than just paying lip service to the idea of strength training for cyclists.
Instead of wasting your time with fancy plyometric exercises and functional training, why not focus on the basics? Whats the evidence to support the idea that exercises like single-leg squats, step-ups, and calf raises actually improve pedaling efficiency and cadence? And no, I dont want to hear about some anecdotal study from a small group of amateur riders. I want to see real data from reputable sources.
Furthermore, how do you reconcile the fact that many elite cyclists have relatively low strength levels compared to other athletes, yet are still able to maintain incredibly high cadences? Is it possible that the relationship between strength and cadence is more complex than we think?
And what about the role of neural adaptations in improving cadence? We all know that the nervous system plays a huge role in controlling movement patterns, so why do we always focus on the muscular aspects of strength training? Are there specific exercises or training protocols that can help improve neural drive and muscle recruitment patterns, leading to faster and more efficient pedaling?
Lastly, can we please stop pretending that strength training is a supplemental aspect of cycling training? Its not. Strength training should be a fundamental component of any cyclists training program, and its time we start treating it as such. So, lets get real and talk about the actual exercises and training protocols that can help improve cadence, rather than just paying lip service to the idea of strength training for cyclists.