Road Cycling · Public discussion

Stopping Traffic

Started by Zoot Katz · · Last activity · 2 posts · 352 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
17 June 2007
Last activity
17 June 2007
Original author
Zoot Katz
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
352
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. That's the headline, with a full front page colour photo of a
    "hold-up" on Burrard Bridge*. It leads an inside article about
    Vancouver's Critical Mass. The West Ender is a local rag that focuses
    on the neighbourhood probably most effected by the monthly CM rides.

    http://web.bcnewsgroup.com/portals-code/list.cgi?cat=23&paper=49&id=1005784.

    I think it reflects well on the VPD and city hall attitudes toward
    recognising the place for Critical Mass in Vancouver history.

    Some excerpts:

    According to Muriel Honey, manager of the special events office at
    the City of Vancouver, the ride is classified as a protest event and,
    therefore, is not required to follow city guidelines. "Under the
    Canadian Bill of Rights, [Critical Mass has] the right to peaceful
    protest, which is what they do," she says.

    Cyclists risk a $100 fine if they are caught riding without a helmet,
    which became law for people of all ages in B.C. in 1996.

    Sgt. Smitas says officers may not always crack down on riders without
    helmets, though, because sometimes it causes more difficulty to
    enforce at the time than to let it go. Often, not wearing a helmet is
    part of the protest," he says. "So, by insisting on enforcement it
    could make a very peaceful demonstration more aggressive. They are
    taking responsibility for themselves, and everyone has the right to
    lawful democratic protest. We support an environment for that."

    End excerpts.

    This is not to open a discussion about headgear. It's just a comment
    about the environment that exists for bicyclists in a city with lots
    of voting cyclists.

    * Hey, that's Michael's orange Masi fixey!
    --
    zk

  2. Zoot Katz said:


    This is not to open a discussion about headgear. It's just a comment
    about the environment that exists for bicyclists in a city with lots
    of voting cyclists.

    Indeed.

    I'm ambivalent about CM as a movement. I agree absolutely about the
    message--bikes are traffic--but I'm less sanguine about the fact that CM
    circuses give a bad impression on bicyclists. Negative impressions are
    tough to fight.

    But I have observed that in certain places, once enough bicyclists have
    taken to the road for transportation, they force a change in the local
    balance of power. When I lived in England, I observed that bicycles and
    bicyclists pretty much ruled Central Cambridge. In London, bicycles got
    grudging respect from other road users simply because high density made it
    necessary to get along.

    Which led me to think: these local balances of power were occasioned by
    the combination of several factors. Population densities in England are
    much higher than in most of North America; settlements there seem more
    compact than they do here. A fair number of English villages/towns/cities
    simply aren't built for automotive traffic: narrow, winding streets and
    so forth. Also, automotive fuel is just that much more expensive.

    The relative bike-friendliness comes from the number of voting bicyclists,
    yes--but it's the underlying pattern of settlement that determines the
    number of bicyclists in the first place. Nothing persuades like the
    pocketbook.

    -Luigi

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.