Stopping Cancer ??

Depends on which is the most effective.
For instance if you have a cancer which is likely to respond to mainstream
treatment then I'd go for mainstream.
Once the tumour were 'debulked' (assuming solid cancer) I would use
alternative therapy after the chemo/surgery/rad.
That way I wouldn't have an idea what cured the cancer but at least I would
have the best of both worlds.
If I had a terminal cancer I would go the proteolytic enzyme route.
Anth

"George Lagergren" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

008 May 19
Topic: Stopping Cancer ??

Per info on the www.educate-yourself.org web site - & selecting
the cancer option - there is a story about a researcher way
back in 1904 (one hundred years ago) who discovered that using
digestive enzymes can resolve cancer.

In fact, he wrote a book about " Cancer & Enzymes" in 1911.

But medicine was excited about the new field of radiation to
get rid of cancer.

So medicine can use either radiation to "burn" away the thick
protein coating surrounding cancer cells.

Or medicine can use digestive enzymes (including protein digestive
enzymes) to "digest" away the thick protein coating surrounding
cancer cells.

Which is the more gentle technique? Which method would health
nuts prefer?

... End of message 19 May 04 11:46
___ Blue Wave/386 v2.30 [NR]