General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Stop drug ads

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 3 posts · 292 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
23 January 2006
Last activity
24 January 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
292
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. These days, we're swamped with ads for prescription drugs that are
    supposed to make us feel happier, sleep better and enhance our sex
    lives.

    The ads may seem ridiculous at times, with people prancing through
    fields of flowers, looking healed and nearly ecstatic.

    But the ads have a darker side, too. When Merck spent over $300 million
    to advertise its drug Vioxx, it created huge demand for the drug, which
    in turn led to as many as 140,000 heart attacks and strokes in the
    U.S., and 60,000 deaths.

    We can't let tragedies like that ever happen again.

    So, today, we're launching a new website, www.StopDrugAds.org. The
    purpose of the website is to educate the public about the dangers of
    prescription drug ads, and to mobilize thousands of Americans to voice
    their opposition to the ads.

    Drug executives are not qualified to tell you what drugs to buy. They
    should not be allowed to meddle in your personal health care decisions.
    After all, they don't even know you. It's like practicing
    medicine without a license.

    Please take a minute to visit StopDrugAds.org, and send comments to the
    FDA. Tell them to end prescription drug advertising in the United
    States.

  2. Just two question; don't take them personally:

    When is it the person's responsibility to do a little reading and
    thinking for themselves, to determine whether they want to play
    "medicine roulette" or not? Why aren't we teaching our children to
    think critically and for themselves, and not listen to "experts" as if
    they were always correct?

  3. montygram said:

    Just two question; don't take them personally:

    When is it the person's responsibility to do a little reading and
    thinking for themselves, to determine whether they want to play
    "medicine roulette" or not? Why aren't we teaching our children to
    think critically and for themselves, and not listen to "experts" as if
    they were always correct?

    Its fine to keep asking over and over again "what about personal
    responsibility" but unfortunately it's not doing any good. Are you fine
    with all the "costs" associated with all the millions that are NOT
    taking personal responsibility? It's always the person's responsibility
    to do a little reading and thinking for themselves. The problem is we
    don't and we won't. Now lets move on and think about what we should do
    about it.

    k

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.