Touring and recreational cycling · Public discussion

Stem Lengths - Actual Or Effective?

Started by cloozoe · · Last activity · 1 post · 1,597 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Touring and recreational cycling
Published
11 May 2015
Last activity
11 May 2015
Original author
cloozoe
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,597
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi,

    New guy here. Have a hybrid with a top tube that's about 30mm too long for me (due to the vagaries of my specific proportions, fits well in other regards). Want to put a new stem on to shorten reach, but while I'm at it want to raise the bars by going from a + 6d rise to +17.

    Question:

    The actual length of my stem is 110mm, and since the rise is only 6d, the effective length is only a hair shorter. With the 17, though, there would be a more significant difference between the actual length and the reach (reach less than length).

    Do manufacturers measure their stems by actual length or effective length? If the former, I'd get a 90; if the latter I'd get an 80.

    Thanks!

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.