General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

statins; why bother?

Started by Fresh~Horses · · Last activity · 2 posts · 419 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
4 May 2004
Last activity
4 May 2004
Original author
Fresh~Horses
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
419
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Atherosclerosis. 2004 Feb;172(2):329-35. Related Articles, Links

    Cardiovascular disease and mortality in statin-treated
    patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

    Mohrschladt MF, Westendorp RG, Gevers Leuven JA, Smelt AH.

    Department of General Internal Medicine, Leiden University
    Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The
    Netherlands.

    Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are at an
    increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD).
    The benefits of statin therapy are not well known since no
    placebo controlled studies have been performed in these
    patients. The aim of this study was to determine the CVD
    event and mortality risk in statin-treated patients with FH.
    A total of 345 FH patients were followed prospectively for 8
    years. Mortality from CVD was compared to that of the
    general population. The absolute risk of CVD in patients
    without a previous history of CVD was 3% per year for men
    and 1.6% for women. Mortality from CVD in patients without a
    previous history was 1.4-fold (95% CI = .6-3.3) increased
    and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) mortality was
    2.6-fold (95% CI = 1.1-6.3) higher compared to the general
    population. This mortality risk was highest in patients
    aged 40-59 years. Female FH patients had no increased CVD
    or IHD mortality risk. Over a period of 8 years the event
    risk of patients with a history of CVD was almost 30% per
    year under age 40 years and 15% in patients aged 60 years
    and over. When compared to the general population,
    mortality from other causes than CVD was lower for
    patients with FH, the relative risks not reaching
    statistical significance. The relative risk of mortality
    from all causes was 1.5 (P < 0.05) for men and 1.0 for
    women. In conclusion, male patients with FH, treated from
    middle-age with statins remain at an increased risk of
    developing CVD.

    PMID: 15019543 [PubMed - in process]

  2. [email hidden] (fresh~horses) wrote in part:

    Quoted message said:

    Atherosclerosis. 2004 Feb;172(2):329-35. Related
    Articles, Links

    Cardiovascular disease and mortality in statin-treated
    patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

    Mohrschladt MF, Westendorp RG, Gevers Leuven JA, Smelt AH.

    Department of General Internal Medicine, Leiden University
    Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The
    Netherlands.

    Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are at an
    increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD).
    The benefits of statin therapy are not well known since no
    placebo controlled studies have been performed in these
    patients. The aim of this study was to determine the CVD
    event and mortality risk in statin-treated patients with
    FH. A total of 345 FH patients were followed prospectively
    for 8 years. Mortality from CVD was compared to that of the
    general population. The absolute risk of CVD in patients
    without a previous history of CVD was 3% per year for men
    and 1.6% for women. Mortality from CVD in patients without
    a previous history was 1.4-fold (95% CI = .6-3.3) increased
    and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) mortality was
    2.6-fold (95% CI = 1.1-6.3) higher compared to the general
    population. This mortality risk was highest in patients
    aged 40-59 years. Female FH patients had no increased CVD
    or IHD mortality risk. Over a period of 8 years the event
    risk of patients with a history of CVD was almost 30% per
    year under age 40 years and 15% in patients aged 60 years
    and over. When compared to the general population,
    mortality from other causes than CVD was lower for
    patients with FH, the relative risks not reaching
    statistical significance. The relative risk of mortality
    from all causes was 1.5 (P < 0.05) for men and 1.0 for
    women. In conclusion, male patients with FH, treated from
    middle-age with statins remain at an increased risk of
    developing CVD.

    PMID: 15019543 [PubMed - in process]

    Seems like a really odd study. Why would you compare a group
    of FH patients on statins with "the general population?" It
    seems like they should be compared with a matched group of
    FH patients not on statins or on some other treatment to see
    which works better.

    I guess this shows that FH patients still don't look quite
    like the general population, even when they are statins. But
    that result doesn't bear on any treatment decision.
    --
    Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.