Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Starting crit's

Started by Brendo · · Last activity · 49 posts · 2,039 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
18 January 2007
Last activity
22 January 2007
Original author
Brendo
Posts
49
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,039
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 49
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Boostland said:

    Wow looks like a nice track.

    I might have to go for a ride there when the next Canberra two day tour is
    held.


    We're currently in training for the Canberra Tour on the 28th & 29th of
    April (don't quote me on dates). I don't think there are any crits for
    the tour but the road races are bound to start at the circuit.

    --
    Bean

    "I've got a bike
    You can ride it if you like
    It's got a basket
    A bell that rings
    And things to make it look good
    I'd give it to you if I could
    But I borrowed it" Pink Floyd

    Remove "yourfinger" before replying

  2. DaveB said:


    If all I did was cycle then I might invest in the CA license. But crits
    are something I fit in around triathlons, duathlons, and running races.
    I aim for a race of some kind each month (or slightly more).

    DaveB

    Hi Dave,

    All of my 'training' rides are basically long slow distance rides
    (although 'long' for me is anything over 40km... *laughs*).

    I don't do any 'hard', 'interval' or 'speed' sessions per se (apart
    from some sprint drills Bleve gave me) - I use crit racing for that. I
    find crits are a much more fun way of doing intervals than just, ummm,
    doing intervals in training...

    So there's your excuse for getting a licence!! You can race weekly now
    and say its 'training'!! *grins*

    Cheers,
    Abby

  3. Absent Husband said:
    DaveB said:

    If all I did was cycle then I might invest in the CA license. But crits
    are something I fit in around triathlons, duathlons, and running races.
    I aim for a race of some kind each month (or slightly more).

    DaveB

    Hi Dave,

    All of my 'training' rides are basically long slow distance rides
    (although 'long' for me is anything over 40km... *laughs*).

    I don't do any 'hard', 'interval' or 'speed' sessions per se (apart
    from some sprint drills Bleve gave me) - I use crit racing for that. I
    find crits are a much more fun way of doing intervals than just, ummm,
    doing intervals in training...

    So there's your excuse for getting a licence!! You can race weekly now
    and say its 'training'!! *grins*

    Cheers,
    Abby

    Yeah that was my theory last summer. This year I got a bit more
    scientific in my training plan. The crits at Kew as interval training
    gave me approx 1 min at close to max Heart Rate and 1 min recovery,
    which left me totally knackered but didn't really do anything for my
    "real" races.

    This year I've done my interval training on the wind trainer with a
    typical session 5 min warmup, 8mins at 85%, 2 mins recover with 4 of
    those and then a cooldown. Based on the first tri this year I suspect
    this has worked well (proof will be over the next couple of weeks), and
    has worked much better than flogging myself each week in a crit.

    The thing is though, I enjoy the crits so was looking forward to doing a
    few once the tri season finishes.

    DaveB

  4. [quote="Bleve"]
    You HCC members who were always touting the $25 to race thing .. you
    get 20 minutes in the naughty corner 🙂

    QUOTE]

    wot? Like CCCC have done until CA's ultimatum that caused both clubs (and others) to drop it?

    The $25 bucks included insurance...

    Been rather noticeable as to how low the D grade numbers have been since the change... 🙄

  5. flyingdutch said:
    Bleve said:

    You HCC members who were always touting the $25 to race thing .. you
    get 20 minutes in the naughty corner 🙂

    QUOTE]

    wot? Like CCCC have done until CA's ultimatum that caused both clubs
    (and others) to drop it?

    The $25 bucks included insurance...

    Been rather noticeable as to how low the D grade numbers have been
    since the change... 🙄

    So can you still ride at Glenvale or Kew with a day license or do you
    need the full CA license?

    DaveB

  6. Bean Long said:

    We use the new purpose built track at Mt
    Stromlo (http://www.stromloforestpark.com.au/).

    That website was obviously designed by some young person. I can barely
    bloody see the tiny writing. Fascist!

    Donga

  7. Boostland said:

    Wow looks like a nice track.

    Very maculine...
    http://www.stromloforestpark.com.au/criterium/map.html

  8. PiledHigher said:
    Boostland said:

    Wow looks like a nice track.

    Very maculine...
    http://www.stromloforestpark.com.au/criterium/map.html

    Hahaha! I know some people heavily involved in construction of the
    downhill/MTB tracks up the top of Mt Stromlo. From they're vantage
    point on te top of the hill they noticed the 'shape' a long time ago but
    have just bee guffawing over it since. From ground level at the track
    no-one on a road bike seems to have noticed although they do call it
    "the bone". I've been told that's because it looks like a dog's bone...
    perhaps not the type of bone they initially thought of!

    --
    Bean

    Remove "yourfinger" before replying

  9. Donga said:
    Bean Long said:

    We use the new purpose built track at Mt
    Stromlo (http://www.stromloforestpark.com.au/).

    That website was obviously designed by some young person. I can barely
    bloody see the tiny writing. Fascist!

    Donga

    Yeah, but I bet it wins some freakin' award for it!

    Nonetheless, the track is noice.

    --
    Bean

    "I've got a bike
    You can ride it if you like
    It's got a basket
    A bell that rings
    And things to make it look good
    I'd give it to you if I could
    But I borrowed it" Pink Floyd

    Remove "yourfinger" before replying

  10. quote='Donga'Bean Long said:

    We use the new purpose built track at Mt
    Stromlo (stromloforestpark.com.austromloforestpark.com.au).

    That website was obviously designed by some young person. I can barely
    bloody see the tiny writing. Fascist!

    Donga[/QUOTE]

    Donga, 'Cntrl +' will increase the font size in most browsers ...

  11. Bean Long said:
    Donga said:
    Bean Long said:

    We use the new purpose built track at Mt
    Stromlo (http://www.stromloforestpark.com.au/).

    That website was obviously designed by some young person. I can barely
    bloody see the tiny writing. Fascist!

    Donga

    Yeah, but I bet it wins some freakin' award for it!

    Nonetheless, the track is noice.

    --
    Bean

    "I've got a bike
    You can ride it if you like
    It's got a basket
    A bell that rings
    And things to make it look good
    I'd give it to you if I could
    But I borrowed it" Pink Floyd

    Remove "yourfinger" before replying

    Yes, it was cool, once I got out my effing magnifiers!

  12. On 2007-01-19, Bleve (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:
    DaveB said:

    Licenses are required? Is that right? FD/Lama/Jono/Carl?? Or can you
    still race with HCC membership only?

    Technically, you always had to have a licence (full CA) to ride them,
    as they weren't club-only races. HCC were taking quite a risk, if
    something had gone wrong and someone got badly hurt, they'd have been
    in a lot of bother insurance-wise.

    You HCC members who were always touting the $25 to race thing .. you
    get 20 minutes in the naughty corner 🙂

    Really though, even a full elite licence is only around $215, which is
    dirt cheap compared to most other organised sports. You get access to
    DISC, track, road racing, crits ... all for how much? We used to have
    to pay around $500 a season (4 months) to play ice hockey and that
    didn't include much. Given that with a CA licence you can race
    pretty-much anywhere in the world, and certainly almost everywhere in
    Australia and un zud, it's worth having.

    For those who were just starting, or who only wanted one crit race a
    week (how many people own a track bike compared to a road bike, and
    could make use of the DISC membership?), it filled a great niche. I
    know quite a few people who were there for that, and we would have
    been perfectly happy if it were only a club race.

    --
    TimC
    White dwarf seeks red giant star for binary relationship

  13. Don't forget to add in the personal health/injury insurance which comes with the CA licence. Excess free personal injury coverage (up to claimable limits). Thats worth big $$$ too.

  14. parawolf said:

    Don't forget to add in the personal health/injury insurance which comes
    with the CA licence. Excess free personal injury coverage (up to
    claimable limits). Thats worth big $$$ too.

    Yep much the same as BV membership, and TA license. So as a cyclist I've
    never seen any advantage in having more than one. Not that I have any of
    them at the moment but BV membership is on my todo list.

    DaveB

  15. quote='DaveB'parawolf said:

    Don't forget to add in the personal health/injury insurance which comes
    with the CA licence. Excess free personal injury coverage (up to
    claimable limits). Thats worth big $$$ too.

    Yep much the same as BV membership, and TA license. So as a cyclist I've
    never seen any advantage in having more than one. Not that I have any of
    them at the moment but BV membership is on my todo list.

    DaveB[/QUOTE]

    I didn't think BV membership had personal injury coverage... I could be wrong though.

  16. flyingdutch said:
    Bleve said:


    You HCC members who were always touting the $25 to race thing .. you
    get 20 minutes in the naughty corner 🙂

    QUOTE]

    wot? Like CCCC have done until CA's ultimatum that caused both clubs
    (and others) to drop it?

    The $25 bucks included insurance...

    Been rather noticeable as to how low the D grade numbers have been
    since the change... 🙄

    It's only a 'club' race, if no other club's members are allowed to
    compete. The HCC crits were in violation of this rule. They're not
    now they know the rule and are enforcing it. Note please, I didn't
    make the rule, nor do I particularly agree with it, but it's the rule
    and we have to play by it. You're all welcome to lobby CSV/CA to
    change it. HCC were breaking that rule by allowing non HCC members to
    race, and as such, I'd suggest that the insurance issue (which
    includes, significantly, liability for the club) is perhaps more
    relevant than may otherwise be thought by those of you who are whinging
    about it. If someone had got hurt, and the race was found to be run
    outside the terms of the licences, I very much doubt that the liability
    insurance would have been paid out, and then the HCC itself would have
    had to pay if there was any damages. That would mean, at the very
    least, the death of the club, and at worst, the bankrupting of its
    committee and race organisers. Insurance companies don't play nice,
    they play very, very hard.

    If you think D grade numbers are down, go have a look at Glenvale and
    Sandown, where they are having huge fields every week in every grade.
    They're getting 240+ riders across all grades. It's not the licence fee
    that's got numbers down, I suggest. Look elsewhere for reasons. You
    can still race on a day licence, which is still $25 or so, AFAIK.

    Of course, if the HCC wanted, they *could* make the races HCC only, and
    then they'd be able to offer the cheap licence without it being
    disingenuous 🙂 Dutchy, you have 17 minutes left before you can come
    out and play!

  17. parawolf said:
    DaveB said:
    parawolf said:

    Don't forget to add in the personal health/injury insurance which


    comes

    Quoted message said:

    with the CA licence. Excess free personal injury coverage (up to
    claimable limits). Thats worth big $$$ too.

    Yep much the same as BV membership, and TA license. So as a cyclist
    I've
    never seen any advantage in having more than one. Not that I have any
    of
    them at the moment but BV membership is on my todo list.

    DaveB

    I didn't think BV membership had personal injury coverage... I could be
    wrong though.

    I don't know about PI, but I do know that the excess on BV's third
    party property is $1000, or it was 18 months ago anyway.

  18. DaveB said:
    Bleve said:

    Really though, even a full elite licence is only around $215, which is
    dirt cheap compared to most other organised sports. You get access to
    DISC, track, road racing, crits ... all for how much? We used to have
    to pay around $500 a season (4 months) to play ice hockey and that
    didn't include much. Given that with a CA licence you can race
    pretty-much anywhere in the world, and certainly almost everywhere in
    Australia and un zud, it's worth having.

    If all I did was cycle then I might invest in the CA license. But crits
    are something I fit in around triathlons, duathlons, and running races.
    I aim for a race of some kind each month (or slightly more). With that
    in mind I might do 3 crits in a good year. Excluding the HCC cheap
    membership, I could get the day license for $20 (ok that was 3 years ago
    so it might have gone up) and could do 9 crits in a year and still be in
    front. It's the same reason I don't get a TA license for tris/du's, I
    would have to be only doing them to do enough events to justify it.

    I reckon we need a multisport license (dream on).

    It would make a lot of sense, yes. Even something as simple(!) as
    combining MTBA with CA and the vets would be a big win. At least MTBA
    and CA have an agreement and you can get crossover licences at a
    reduced rate.

    Quoted message said:

    You say technically you always needed a CA license for HCC Crits, but if
    it's true, obviously that has never been enforced. Is there any change
    this year?

    You may or may not have had a CA licence, if you did, it was a very
    restricted one. At least, that's my understanding of the club licence.
    The Blackburn website says the following :

    Quote :
    A Club Only licence will only allow you to ride at club races. This
    means that if you purchase a club licence you can race on club days at
    the track, and at the Club Championships on the road (all other road
    races in the fixture are classed as combines). We do not recommend the
    purchase of a Club Only Licence as it is very restrictive.
    end quote

    The full schedule of fees for Blackburn is here, including a breakdown
    of how much the club gets and how much CSV/CA gets :

    http://www.bbn.org.au/membership/fees2007/renewal_instructions.pdf

    and CSV's site :

    http://www.vic.cycling.org.au/Membership/scaleoffees.htm

    Note: HCC crits are combine* events, NOT club only events, as they
    allow riders from other clubs to compete. Additionally, the HCC
    'licence' at $25 was almost definatly not a licence (an elite club
    licence for 2007 costs $142), but just club membership, which provides
    you with precisely nothing in terms of a licence, you still had to buy
    one. Other clubs generally include the licence in their membership
    fees and are up front about it. What certain HCC members were doing
    with the $25 thing, was deceiving people into thinking that's what it
    cost to go racing. It wasn't, it was what it cost to join the HCC,
    which wasn't ever enough to get a racing licence.

    * crits are a bit interesting in this regards, they're really more like
    opens, as there's no enforcing of combine member clubs only at them.

    As to it being enforced, I suspect it's more a case of it being made
    clear to HCC that they were at considerable risk if they continued to
    allow non-licenced riders to race, but I haven't seen the
    correspondence between HCC and CSV so that's conjecture. My housemate
    is a committee member of HCC (what there is of a committee, HCC has a
    rather interesting structure, it's an arm of the Hawthorn citizens
    youth club or something and not a standalone club like most of the
    others) and I'll ask him about it when I next see him and get the whole
    story.

  19. On 2007-01-19, Bleve (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    If you think D grade numbers are down, go have a look at Glenvale and
    Sandown, where they are having huge fields every week in every grade.
    They're getting 240+ riders across all grades. It's not the licence fee
    that's got numbers down, I suggest. Look elsewhere for reasons. You
    can still race on a day licence, which is still $25 or so, AFAIK.

    Which, when combined with the race fee, is only 349% above the race
    fee of previous years.

    I wouldn't have raced if it cost me that much to race when I started.

    I also wouldn't have paid $250/yr+race fees to just find out whether I
    was any good at racing, and hence whether it was worth taking it up as
    a hobby. If CSV/CA find there are now fewer people taking up cycling
    racing because of the higher barrier of entry, who will they blame?

    --
    TimC
    Er, RFC 882 put the dot in .com. -- unknown

  20. TimC said:

    On 2007-01-19, Bleve (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    If you think D grade numbers are down, go have a look at Glenvale and
    Sandown, where they are having huge fields every week in every grade.
    They're getting 240+ riders across all grades. It's not the licence fee
    that's got numbers down, I suggest. Look elsewhere for reasons. You
    can still race on a day licence, which is still $25 or so, AFAIK.

    Which, when combined with the race fee, is only 349% above the race
    fee of previous years.

    I wouldn't have raced if it cost me that much to race when I started.

    That's unfortunate for you, and would have been your loss.

    Quoted message said:

    I also wouldn't have paid $250/yr+race fees to just find out whether I
    was any good at racing, and hence whether it was worth taking it up as
    a hobby. If CSV/CA find there are now fewer people taking up cycling
    racing because of the higher barrier of entry, who will they blame?

    You can still get a day licence. Did you look at the schedule of fees?
    The licence requirement is still trivially low - how much does a
    racebike cost? A set of tyres? A set of knicks & jersey? The licence
    fee is bugger-all compared to things that most roadies don't even think
    twice about.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.