Road Cycling · Public discussion

Stage 8

Started by Stewart Fleming · · Last activity · 2 posts · 330 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
9 July 2005
Last activity
10 July 2005
Original author
Stewart Fleming
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
330
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In the Tour de France, there's always something happening, even if you
    don't see it. The Tour is more than just a race; it's a complex system
    that takes on a life of its own on the roads every July. From the
    outside, the entire inner workings are beyond comprehension - to
    understand WHY something happens in the Tour, we would need to be part
    of the inside, living and experiencing it along with the riders.

    That's why, when a team like Iles Balears starts laying down heavy tempo
    on two occasions in a stage, most notably on the final climb, we can
    explain it, but never truly understand it. That's why, when a team like
    T-Mobile puts out enormous effort on a stage and doesn't even come up
    with the win, that we know there is something happening, we just don't
    know what it is.

    What did T-Mobile achieve today? In practical terms, they moved Kloden
    into the top 10, got a 2nd place on the stage and picked up some
    mountains points. In terms of the overall, nothing really happened.
    What did they achieve, in a more subtle sense? They isolated Lance
    Armstrong and exposed a weakness in Discovery, making it evident that
    there are attacking possibilities where the road goes up and the
    Discovery tempo monsters cannot integrate.

    Now, eyes are watching and those that are part of the system integrate
    the evidence better than we can. Will any team director's ambition
    stretch the bounds of etiquette in the final tour of Armstrong?

    So although nothing obvious happened, something sinister did. Will it
    work to T-Mobile's advantage, to the advantage of others, or will the
    realization of a weakness and a "jour de merde" be an awakening and a
    focus of effort by Discovery to defend? Has Lance just "got mad"?

  2. Stewart Fleming said:

    In the Tour de France, there's always something happening, even if you
    don't see it. The Tour is more than just a race; it's a complex system
    that takes on a life of its own on the roads every July. From the
    outside, the entire inner workings are beyond comprehension - to
    understand WHY something happens in the Tour, we would need to be part
    of the inside, living and experiencing it along with the riders.

    That's why, when a team like Iles Balears starts laying down heavy tempo
    on two occasions in a stage, most notably on the final climb, we can
    explain it, but never truly understand it. That's why, when a team like
    T-Mobile puts out enormous effort on a stage and doesn't even come up
    with the win, that we know there is something happening, we just don't
    know what it is.

    What did T-Mobile achieve today? In practical terms, they moved Kloden
    into the top 10, got a 2nd place on the stage and picked up some
    mountains points. In terms of the overall, nothing really happened.
    What did they achieve, in a more subtle sense? They isolated Lance
    Armstrong and exposed a weakness in Discovery, making it evident that
    there are attacking possibilities where the road goes up and the
    Discovery tempo monsters cannot integrate.

    Now, eyes are watching and those that are part of the system integrate
    the evidence better than we can. Will any team director's ambition
    stretch the bounds of etiquette in the final tour of Armstrong?

    So although nothing obvious happened, something sinister did. Will it
    work to T-Mobile's advantage, to the advantage of others, or will the
    realization of a weakness and a "jour de merde" be an awakening and a
    focus of effort by Discovery to defend? Has Lance just "got mad"?

    I saw a short interview with JU yesterday, according to him:

    - DSC looked weak even on the first climb - he said he saw it, so others
    will have seen this also
    - Many teams will attack today because of that

    We'll see

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.