Home Road Cycling SSDD at UCI
Thread details
What we know about this thread
Original section Road Cycling
Published 13 September 2006
Last activity 14 September 2006
Original author B. Lafferty
Posts 5
Discussion status Public discussion
Total views 277
Views / 30 days 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–5 of 5 Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Original post B. Lafferty
Archived post
13 September 2006, 14:48 UTC
#1
UCI president Pat McQuaid said he did not understand Andreu's objectives in revealing that he had used EPO.
"If Andreu wishes to say that, that's up to him to say that," said McQuaid.
"I don't know what he's trying to achieve because he cannot achieve anything by saying this."
McQuaid said neither admission should cast doubt on Armstrong's record or his 1999 Tour victory.
"To take dope is an individual decision by an individual rider," said McQuaid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/cycling/5341182.stm
Email address hidden
Archived post
13 September 2006, 15:46 UTC
#2
B. Lafferty said: UCI president Pat McQuaid said he did not understand Andreu's objectives in revealing that he had used EPO.
"If Andreu wishes to say that, that's up to him to say that," said McQuaid.
"I don't know what he's trying to achieve because he cannot achieve anything by saying this."
McQuaid said neither admission should cast doubt on Armstrong's record or his 1999 Tour victory.
"To take dope is an individual decision by an individual rider," said McQuaid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/cycling/5341182.stm
Do you honestly expect him to say different? We all know what's going on up at the top.
13 September 2006, 15:52 UTC
#3
<[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
B. Lafferty said: UCI president Pat McQuaid said he did not understand Andreu's objectives in revealing that he had used EPO.
"If Andreu wishes to say that, that's up to him to say that," said McQuaid.
"I don't know what he's trying to achieve because he cannot achieve anything by saying this."
McQuaid said neither admission should cast doubt on Armstrong's record or his 1999 Tour victory.
"To take dope is an individual decision by an individual rider," said McQuaid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/cycling/5341182.stm
Do you honestly expect him to say different? We all know what's going on up at the top.
I had hoped that he would given his statements about cleaning up the sport. I guess not.
13 September 2006, 18:18 UTC
#4
B. Lafferty said: <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
B. Lafferty said: UCI president Pat McQuaid said he did not understand Andreu's objectives in revealing that he had used EPO.
"If Andreu wishes to say that, that's up to him to say that," said McQuaid.
"I don't know what he's trying to achieve because he cannot achieve anything by saying this."
McQuaid said neither admission should cast doubt on Armstrong's record or his 1999 Tour victory.
"To take dope is an individual decision by an individual rider," said McQuaid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/cycling/5341182.stm
Do you honestly expect him to say different? We all know what's going on up at the top.
I had hoped that he would given his statements about cleaning up the sport. I guess not.
I was surprised too. At least he could have said it was good that users were speaking up and helping us face the issue. So, do you think Armstrong got to him directly, or is he just falling back into UCIness (ie circle the wagons) ?
SLAVE of THE STATE
Archived post
14 September 2006, 00:08 UTC
#5
B. Lafferty said: <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
B. Lafferty said: UCI president Pat McQuaid said he did not understand Andreu's objectives in revealing that he had used EPO.
"If Andreu wishes to say that, that's up to him to say that," said McQuaid.
"I don't know what he's trying to achieve because he cannot achieve anything by saying this."
McQuaid said neither admission should cast doubt on Armstrong's recordor his 1999 Tour victory.
"To take dope is an individual decision by an individual rider," said McQuaid.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/cycling/5341182.stm
Do you honestly expect him to say different? We all know what's going on up at the top.
I had hoped that he would given his statements about cleaning up the sport. I guess not.
He had such statements but withheld them? Is this the "code of silence?" You're a law-yer, explain the code to everyone.
§0.0.0 Dope Talk <TBFIBBL>
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
· 0 bots
· 0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.