General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Some Wins and Losses

Started by Nana Weedkiller · · Last activity · 4 posts · 249 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 October 2003
Last activity
16 October 2003
Original author
Nana Weedkiller
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
249
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In the ongoing libel case in which Ilena Rosenthal is involved.

    http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/
    Docket # A096451

  2. So the reversal will decrease the amount awarded........perhaps to a near
    the $$$ amount owed to another.
    A possible attachment of the proceeds?

    "Nana Weedkiller" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In the ongoing libel case in which Ilena Rosenthal is involved.

    http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/
    Docket # A096451

  3. Thanks Nidiffer for bringing this to the attention of these boards.

    For those interested ... Nidiffer "Nana" "Cathy Credulous" began her
    assaults on me right after this SLAPP suit was filed.

    He is one of the many shills that fills these boards with the ranting
    of the appropriately named "HealthFrauds" that Barrett & Polevoy lead.

    Indeed ... the Court of Appeals agreed that Quack Steve Barrett and
    Malicious Prosecutor Chris Grell had absolutely no claims against me
    ....

    And are required by law to pay my attorneys fees.

    As to one statment that I re-posted that Quack Polevoy was "stalking"
    Christine McVee ... that is sent back to the Superior Court to
    litigate.

    I'm still in the process of reading it all (55 pages) myself.

    One important point these 3 Appeals Court Judges made ... calling
    someone a Quack is not the dominion of Steve Barrett ... it is an
    opinion ... and protected free speech.

    I do believe that Barrett is a quack ... by his very own definition.

    Most importantly ... and I will be posting more on this ... is that
    his "opinion" on Multiple Chemical Sensitivity is industry junk
    science ... funded by the Chemical Cartels via his ACSH.

    That was the beginning of my distaste for him ... thousands of women
    harmed by breast implants (claimed to be debunked by his ACSH) suffer
    from this ... and his "opinion" is that the wonderful doctors and
    scientists studying this phenomenon, should have their "licenses
    revoked."

    http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/quack-suppdeclaration.html

    Indeed ... he has been a part of several lawsuits against these fine
    doctors ... also attempting to shut them up ... as he attempted with
    this SLAPP suit against me.

    More to come.

    www.humanticsfoundation.com/quacklibelsuit.htm (to be updated)

    "Nana Weedkiller" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    In the ongoing libel case in which Ilena Rosenthal is involved.

    http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/
    Docket # A096451

  4. "Ilena" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    And are required by law to pay my attorneys fees.

    As you are required by law to pay the Judgment for attorney fees against
    you.

    Quoted message said:

    I'm still in the process of reading it all (55 pages) myself.

    And when you are done....will you willingly make arrangements for the
    partial attorney fees you will receive to be paid directly to the Judgment
    against you, which you have owed?

    More to be revealed.......

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.