Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is
only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK.
--
Dane Buson - [email protected]
PHB: "According to M$ Project, your utilization level is 1850%."
CS: "You mean I have a load average of 18.5?" -- Charlie Stross
On Jun 9, 2:40 pm, Dane Buson <[email protected]> wrote:
> In rec.bicycles.misc Peter Pie Eater <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > javawizard wrote:
> >> I put together a little web page atwww.odd-bikes.comwith links to
> >> the strangest bicycles I have ever seen. Enjoy! - Jeff
>
> > Very nice. I particularly like the Zero Bike:
>
> >http://www.flickr.com/photos/laulaulau3/31994357/sizes/o/
>
> Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is
> only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK.
The only thing the OP is counting is the click-through dollars. Check
the spammi...errr...posting history.
In rec.bicycles.misc RicodJour <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Jun 9, 2:40 pm, Dane Buson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is
>> only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK.
>
> The only thing the OP is counting is the click-through dollars. Check
> the spammi...errr...posting history.
Well yeah, but I was mostly just talking to the responder (I am assuming
that he's not a sockpuppet).
--
Dane Buson - [email protected]
And it should be the law: If you use the word `paradigm' without knowing
what the dictionary says it means, you go to jail. No exceptions.
-- David Jones
Dane Buson wrote:
> In rec.bicycles.misc RicodJour <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Jun 9, 2:40 pm, Dane Buson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is
>>> only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK.
Well I found it interesting because I'd not come across the Zero Bike
before. It was just a list of interesting ideas as far as I was concerned.
>> The only thing the OP is counting is the click-through dollars. Check
>> the spammi...errr...posting history.
I apologise if I've encouraged a spammer. I did notice that he'd
crossposted to quite a few groups but they all seemed on topic as was
his web site. With all the non-relevant spams I get day in day out, one
that is actually targetted towards a particular audience is a refreshing
change.
> Well yeah, but I was mostly just talking to the responder (I am assuming
> that he's not a sockpuppet).
Well having just defended a spammer, I'm questioning whether I'm a
sockpuppet myself :-o I'm not though!
In rec.bicycles.misc Peter Pie Eater <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dane Buson wrote:
>> In rec.bicycles.misc RicodJour <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Jun 9, 2:40 pm, Dane Buson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>> Can you really count the Zero bike in such a list? Since it really is
>>>> only a concept, and not a working vehicle AFAIK.
>
> Well I found it interesting because I'd not come across the Zero Bike
> before. It was just a list of interesting ideas as far as I was concerned.
I suppose I look at the zero bike as over-engineered tomfoolery. There
are enough bad ideas in bicycling that we don't need to go blue-skying
to find new novel bad ideas.
>> Well yeah, but I was mostly just talking to the responder (I am assuming
>> that he's not a sockpuppet).
>
> Well having just defended a spammer, I'm questioning whether I'm a
> sockpuppet myself :-o I'm not though!
Suuuurre you're not. I just have one question sock-boy - Cotton or
Wool?
;-)
--
Dane Buson - [email protected]
"Protecting the children is a good way to get a lot of adults
who cant stand up for themselves" -J. Stecher
