General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Soccer vs Jogging Revisited

Started by Jim · · Last activity · 2 posts · 245 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
21 September 2007
Last activity
21 September 2007
Original author
Jim
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
245
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A few weeks ago, a press release on Soccer vs Jogging vs TV Watching was
    discussed.

    A fuller release is below. Muscle mass gain was best for soccer players.

    Heart rate was monitored. Soccer players experienced peak heart rates of
    90% of max. The joggers never had similar high peak heart rates.

    The Soccer players claimed to have much more fun.

    Caveats were expressed on taking up high intensity sports.
    =============================================================

    http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/09/20/soccer_hea_print.html

    Soccer Burns More Fat Than Jogging
    Maria Cheng, Associated Press

    Sept. 20, 2007 — There's a new slogan for weight-watchers: Burn it like
    Beckham. A friendly game of soccer, a new study has found, works off
    more fat and builds up more muscle than jogging.

    Danish scientists, who conducted their research on 37 men, also found
    the soccer players felt less tired after exercising than the joggers
    because they were having more fun.

    "This is good news for men who prefer to play football with their
    mates," said Gary O'Donovan, a sports medicine expert at the University
    of Exeter who was not connected to the study.

    To measure how hard the men were working out, the researchers strapped
    heart monitors to their chests and compared blood samples and muscle
    tissue from before and after matches and jogging sessions.

    The researchers selected men with similar health profiles aged 31 to 33
    and split them into groups of soccer players, joggers, and couch
    potatoes — who not surprisingly ended the three month-long study in the
    worst shape.

    Summer heat means danger for athletes.
    Get more Discovery News video here.

    Each period of exercise lasted about one hour and took place three times
    a week. After 12 weeks, researchers found that the body fat percentage
    in the soccer players dropped by 3.7 percent, compared to about 2
    percent for the joggers.

    The soccer players also increased their muscle mass by almost 2
    kilograms (4.5 pounds), whereas the joggers didn't have any significant
    change. Those who did no exercise registered little change in body fat
    and muscle mass.

    "Even though the football (soccer) players were untrained, there were
    periods in the game that were so intense that their cardiovascular was
    maximally taxed, just like professional football (soccer) players," said
    Peter Krustrup, head of Copenhagen University's department of exercise
    and sport sciences, who led the study.

    The soccer players and the joggers had the same average heart rate, but
    the soccer players got a better workout because of intense bursts of
    activity.

    Krustrup and his colleagues found there were periods during soccer
    matches when the players' hearts were pumping at 90 percent their full
    capacity. But the joggers' hearts were never pushed as hard.

    "The argument as to whether or not vigorous activity is better than
    moderate activity is over," O'Donovan said.

    He warned, however, that sedentary people shouldn't jump-start their
    bodies with a dose of intense exercise but rather ease into their
    fitness regime with some moderate activity.

    Unlike the soccer players, the joggers consistently thought their runs
    were exhausting.

    "The soccer players were having more fun, so they were more focused on
    scoring goals and helping the team, rather than the feeling of strain
    and muscle pain," Krustrup said.

    Health officials were unsure how much impact the study results might
    have on the wider population.

    Nick Cavill, a research associate at the British Heart Foundation at
    Oxford University, said it's hard enough convincing people to exercise
    moderately, let alone engage in a high-intensity sport like soccer.

    "There might be enormous benefits to telling people to play football
    twice a week," he said. "But if they're not going to do it, then that
    message may be useless."

  2. I think where this study fits is to let people who are already exercising
    know of the importance of mixing in bouts of higher intensity
    work....whether that be walking/running up a hill as hard as possible or
    doing a similar thing on a dreadmill. Of course, the best thing would be to
    find an exercise activity that you really enjoy (ie, cycling, basketball,
    etc.) and work in HIIT there. Nonexercisers should never start with
    intervals, but should build a base first with flat cardio and work into HIIT
    over time.

    As someone else pointed out before, the muscle mass gain won't continue
    indefinitely...it's more of an adaptation response of the body to the new
    activity.

    HIIT has long (now) been known to have the benefits (and the risks) pointed
    to in this article. IMO, it's good to see more evidence of it because most
    people seem to think that only long flat cardio has benefits. Short bouts
    of HIIT activity can be more beneifical and actually take less time, too.
    There is a risk of injury that should not be taken lightly, however. That
    means one should choose the activity wisely. What may be good for person A
    may be terrible for person B, even if you are use to exercise.

    Jim wrote:
    ::
    :: Caveats were expressed on taking up high intensity sports.
    :: =============================================================
    ::
    :: http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/09/20/soccer_hea_print.html
    ::
    ::
    :: Soccer Burns More Fat Than Jogging
    :: Maria Cheng, Associated Press

    snip

    :: Health officials were unsure how much impact the study results might
    :: have on the wider population.
    ::
    :: Nick Cavill, a research associate at the British Heart Foundation at
    :: Oxford University, said it's hard enough convincing people to
    :: exercise moderately, let alone engage in a high-intensity sport like
    :: soccer.
    ::
    :: "There might be enormous benefits to telling people to play football
    :: twice a week," he said. "But if they're not going to do it, then that
    :: message may be useless."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.