Bike Cafe · Public discussion

Should the peloton have waited for Mayo?

Started by tcklyde · · Last activity · 2 posts · 917 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Bike Cafe
Published
10 July 2004
Last activity
10 July 2004
Original author
tcklyde
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
917
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Been a bit of discussion amongst my TdF watching group about why the peloton took off after Mayo's crash in stage 3.

    Some have argued that it wasn't necessary to wait because:

    a) the peloton was heading into the cobbles and jockeying for position was essential and part of pre-stage plans.

    b) Mayo wasn't in the yellow jersey. (although this shouldn't matter. Armstrong waited for Ullirich after his spectacular crash in 2001, for instance.)

    There was definitely some early confusion. I think Ligget said something about not understanding why they didn't wait. And there's no question the Postal, with some help from Phonak and T-Mobile, took off after the cobbles. I can only imagine they were hoping to finish off Mayo. Sounds like taking advantage of a crash to put away a rival to me? So what gives?

  2. This thread is covered under another forum and was originally posted on July 6, 2004. It's entitled, "Should they have waited for Mayo?"

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.