Is it really worth risking a subpar performance and potential bonk just to prove a point about the benefits of fasted training, or are those who swear by zone 4 sessions on an empty stomach just trying to convince themselves that theyre getting an edge when in reality theyre just being reckless and putting their bodies at risk of serious damage?
Do the supposed benefits of increased fat adaptation and improved mental toughness really outweigh the risks of decreased power output and increased muscle damage, or are we just drinking the Kool-Aid and ignoring the very real possibility that were actually hindering our progress by training fasted?
Whats the real science behind fasted training, and are the benefits really worth the costs, or are we just seeing a placebo effect and convincing ourselves that were getting faster when in reality were just getting weaker?
Are those who claim that fasted training is the key to unlocking their full potential just trying to sound cool and edgy, or is there really something to this whole fasted training thing, and if so, whats the optimal way to incorporate it into a training plan without sacrificing performance or putting our bodies at risk?
Do the supposed benefits of increased fat adaptation and improved mental toughness really outweigh the risks of decreased power output and increased muscle damage, or are we just drinking the Kool-Aid and ignoring the very real possibility that were actually hindering our progress by training fasted?
Whats the real science behind fasted training, and are the benefits really worth the costs, or are we just seeing a placebo effect and convincing ourselves that were getting faster when in reality were just getting weaker?
Are those who claim that fasted training is the key to unlocking their full potential just trying to sound cool and edgy, or is there really something to this whole fasted training thing, and if so, whats the optimal way to incorporate it into a training plan without sacrificing performance or putting our bodies at risk?