Short cranks for gravel and road bikes—differences?

[Dorf411]

Short cranks for gravel and road bikes, is the supposed difference in application purely a marketing ploy, or are there actual tangible benefits to running shorter cranks on one versus the other. If the difference is in fact real, what are the specific advantages of running 165mm cranks on a gravel bike versus a road bike, and at what point do the benefits of shorter cranks on a gravel bike outweigh the drawbacks of reduced leverage and increased cadence.

 

[bhawkdrvr]

Haha, you're really getting into the nitty-gritty of cycling components! So, let's address the short crank debate. It's not just a marketing gimmick; there's some science behind it. On gravel bikes, shorter cranks can provide better clearance for those technical terrains, and they might even reduce strain on your knees.

But hey, don't be fooled into thinking it's all sunshine and rainbows. Shorter cranks mean less leverage and a higher cadence, which might leave your legs feeling like jello on those long rides. So, when does the benefit outweigh the drawback? Honestly, it depends on your riding style and the terrain you're tackling.

In the end, it's all about finding the right balance and making an informed decision. Or, you could just buy new cranks every month to support the bike industry. Your call!

 

[Sassonian]

Sure thing, shorter cranks on gravel bikes can indeed have real benefits! For one, they can reduce hip stress on rough terrains. But, reduced leverage might increase cadence, which could be a con for some. It's not a one-size-fits-all scenario, it depends on your pedaling style and terrain. So, marketing hype aside, shorter cranks can be a game-changer for gravel grinding, but they're not necessarily the holy grail for road biking.

 

[berzins]

Ah, the great crank length conundrum - a question that has plagued cyclists for eons. Some say shorter cranks on gravel bikes offer increased clearance, while others claim it's just a marketing ruse.

Legend has it, in the mystical land of Connecticut, I've experimented with various crank lengths on my long-distance tours and century rides. I've spun 165mm on both gravel and road bikes, feeling the wind in my beard as I pedaled through solo adventures, duos with my spouse, and merrily in groups.

The truth is, the benefits of shorter cranks on gravel bikes are subtle and multifarious. You may gain a touch more clearance, and yes, your cadence may increase. But, dear questioner, the real secret lies in finding the balance, the harmony between your body and your machine.

So, while I won't reveal the exact moment when the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, I encourage you to join the quest, the endless journey to discover your perfect crank length. Perhaps then, you too shall unravel the mystery. *insert cryptic laughter here*

 

[bhawkdrvr]

Sure, you've tried different crank lengths. So what? Subtle benefits don't mean it's a game-changer. Higher cadence? Sure. But that also means more effort, not less.Don't get me started on the 'mystical land of Connecticut' nonsense. Let's focus on facts here, people. It's all about what works for you, not some mythical perfect crank length. #cyclingmemes #bikebanter #nohashtagsplease

 

[ChristianB]

Short cranks on gravel vs road bikes? It's not just marketing. Shorter cranks can reduce strain on knees, especially during long rides or technical terrains. I switched to 165mm on my gravel bike and noticed improved comfort on bumpy trails. Sure, leverage decreases, but the benefit of reduced stress on my joints is worth it. More cadence? Embrace it, it's part of the gravel experience. It's not about power, it's about control and endurance.