I know...another compact thread. Does anyone have an opinion on the Shimano compact or the SRAM Rival compact. I'm buying one of them, and the Rival is about $100.00 less and includes the bottom bracket. Thanks
Cycling Equipment · Public discussion
Shimano or SRAM Compact?
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Cycling Equipment
- Published
- 1 January 2007
- Last activity
- 3 January 2007
- Original author
- Mish
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 848
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
IMHO I would stay with Shimano (although Campagnolo is, of course, better 😉).
Stay away from the new kids on the block for another year or so, and let others do the early adopting...
Personal opinion, of course!
-
Mish said:
I know...another compact thread. Does anyone have an opinion on the Shimano compact or the SRAM Rival compact. I'm buying one of them, and the Rival is about $100.00 less and includes the bottom bracket. Thanks
Have you considered the Ritchey WCS 100 V Compact? Weighs 570g. Cost $149.99US on sale at Performance Bike (before any 20% off coupon you can find):
http://www.performancebike.com/shop/Profile.cfm?SKU=20106 (Shimano Octalink BB weighs 225g. Total w/ BB=795g.)SRAM weighs 725g. with BB. Costs about $190 (BB included) at BikeTiresDirect (before any discounts).
Shimano weighs 820g. Cost $260 or so (less on sale), plus another $40 for bottom bracket.
Side-by-side comparison at this link:
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/harris/cranks/110-compact-double.html
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.