Road Cycling · Public discussion

"Serious concerns over urinary EPO test"

Started by Robert Chung · · Last activity · 3 posts · 608 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
23 September 2005
Last activity
23 September 2005
Original author
Robert Chung
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
608
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Chief online editor Dr Jeff Jones has a special news feature at:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=features/2005/epotest_problems

  2. "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Chief online editor Dr Jeff Jones has a special news feature at:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=features/2005/epotest_problems

    "I wouldn't say that the problems with the old test cast doubt on all
    positives under it."
    - Proteome Systems' Nicolle Packer on the ramifications of a faulty EPO test

    Back to square one.

  3. TM said:


    "Robert Chung" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Chief online editor Dr Jeff Jones has a special news feature at:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=features/2005/epotest_problems

    "I wouldn't say that the problems with the old test cast doubt on all
    positives under it."
    - Proteome Systems' Nicolle Packer on the ramifications of a faulty EPO test

    Back to square one.

    Square two. Because they still sit your ass out for 2 weeks if your
    hematocrit is over 50%*.

    At least that rule helps keep them from dropping dead.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.