Same story, second verse...
Tired of running marathons. Have mountain biked my whole life. Am looking to diversify my exercise and riding. I'm looking for a bike that I will use on an indoor trainer, for shorter conditioning rides, and for mid-range triathlons. I don't foresee a lot of centuries in my future. I'm a tall, light fellow, if that makes a difference.
I've done a lot of shopping, and here's what I've liked most so far:
http://www.feltusa.com/2004_bikes/f70.html
http://www.feltracing.com/F65.html
http://www.orbea-usa.com/Bikes.php?id=12
I haven't actually ridden the F70, but I've ridden an F65 and can get them for the same price. The Orbea was really sexy and fun, but I don't know anything about Campy components, and I also wonder about the alloy/carbon blend on the frame. It seems that tacking on a carbon seatstay would weaken the frame. Any thoughts on that? The Felt seemed bullet proof, and I like it's conservative styling. The ride was less responsive, though.
The Orbea also seems to have a slightly shorter top tube. Will that make it more comfortable when I add an aero bar for tris, or is all this moot as it can be addressed by moving the seat forward?
If you could get all 3 of the above bikes for a similar price, which would you be inclined to buy? All impressions would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
PS. Is the Kurt Kinetic really that much better than the Cycleops Fluid2?