UK and Europe · Public discussion

scott genius

Started by Simon Gooch · · Last activity · 4 posts · 664 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
30 May 2004
Last activity
30 May 2004
Original author
Simon Gooch
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
664
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. what do you reckon on the scott genius mc50

  2. In article <Xwpuc.911$2t3.74@newsfe1-win>, [email hidden] says...

    Quoted message said:

    scott genius mc50

    I have no idea but...

    http://www.rutlandcycling.co.uk/genius_review.htm

    ....should get you started.

    Is LX spec normal on £1500+ mtb's these days?

    --
    Mark (MSA)
    This post is packaged by intellectual weight, not volume. Some settling
    of contents may have occurred during transmission

  3. in message <Xwpuc.911$2t3.74@newsfe1-win>, Simon Gooch

    (') said:

    what do you reckon on the scott genius mc50

    Like too many US-designed full suspension bikes, ideal for a very dry
    climate. The rear shock is square in the path of all the mud and grit
    flung by the rear wheel, which isn't going to do wonders for it's
    service life. Which given that the shock on the Genius is a proprietary
    part is going to be even more expensive. I'm also (for similar reasons)
    a bit skeptical of the benefits of four bar linkages. Yes, OK, they
    give more precise control of the movement of the back axle. Or at
    least, they do provided that all those pivot bearings are in perfect
    condition. Which they aren't going to be after you've ridden the bike
    in muddy conditions a time or two.

    Also, the things Scott is trying to solve with their particular take on
    the virtual pivot point thing is chain-growth induced pedal bob.
    There's a much simpler solution to that, which is a unified rear
    triangle.

    This isn't to knock the Genius, which I haven't tried. The kit on it
    looks good, and I approve of the very large diameter seatpost, which
    should make for good stiffness. Until all those linkage bearings are
    shot, of course.

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ... a mild, inoffensive sadist...

  4. Simon Brooke said:


    Also, the things Scott is trying to solve with their particular take on
    the virtual pivot point thing is chain-growth induced pedal bob.
    There's a much simpler solution to that, which is a unified rear
    triangle.

    Agree with all your points about Southern Californian bike. On URT I can't
    agree though with well known shortcomings. The answer to pedal bob, apart
    from good single pivot design like Santa Cruzes or Marins is to fit a modern
    generation shock like the 5th Element. Bob solved

    Tony

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.