Mountain Bikes · Public discussion
Science Proves Vandeman Wrong
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Mountain Bikes
- Published
- 12 July 2004
- Last activity
- 12 July 2004
- Original author
- Smokie
- Posts
- 3
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 2,213
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
-
Unfortunately, the reality of it all is that science is
open to interpretation. People tend to manipulate, or place
undue emphasis on various aspects of the facts to forward
their cause.Now I'm not saying these studies are right or wrong, just
that the people who want to believe them (us at alt.mountain-
bike) will agree with them, and those who want to discredit
them (Mr V) will discredit them. I don't this it's very
often that these studies actually convince someone to
"switch sides".I think the important question is "Why does Mr V decide to
come here and peddle (no pun intended) his theories?". There
should be some acceptable science newsletter or magazine
that would give him some paper to rant on. But it seems like
he's wasting so much energy spewing his ideas here.Has anyone told him that we are all mountain bikers?
"Yo! Mike! Sorry we can't pat you on the back for all your
hard work, but we just don't appreciate it. Perhaps you
should go elsewhere to get the credit you 'deserve'".Alpha Male
PS - You don't see the Pope going into alt.satanism to try
and bash those darned satanists... or do you?"Smokie" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
"]news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.