Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Rules of Thumb

Started by Gary Mc · · Last activity · 4 posts · 964 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
20 February 2004
Last activity
24 February 2004
Original author
Gary Mc
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
964
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. When I was a runner there were rules of thumb about training. Example: never increase your mileage
    more than 10% in one month. Another: Your long run of the week should not exceed 40 % of your weekly
    total. The older that I got, the more ironclad these rules became.

    Last year as a biker, my 3rd on a recumbent, I injured my knee in the spring, probably by trying too
    much too soon. The injury nagged my somewhat arthritic knees for the whole season. My mileage
    dropped to 2500 miles from 3500 miles the year before.

    This season I tried to keep my riding up over the winter and progressing more slowly. Anyone read
    any rules of thumb about the pace of coming into full shape on a bike. Any guidelines on how much of
    your weekly total miles should be in your weekly long ride.

    I am in my 59th year and beyond the "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead" age.

    Gary McCarty, Greenspeed GTO, Salt Lake City

  2. Gary,

    I don't think that miles are the problem. You can modify your approach to those miles so that you
    minimize knee stress. Out of a 4 or 5 day riding week I use one for "pace" (steady without strain,
    cadence 85-95 for cruise), one for intervals (pace with a couple of all out sprints, cadence above
    105 sustained for sprint), one for major miles at slightly less than pace, cadence 80-90) and one
    for easy recovery. I'm no expert, but it seems to me that you can do the miles in such a way as to
    minimize the trauma and still gain the advantages of time on the bike. Increasing miles at 10% a
    month seems a little slow to me. How 'bout 10% a week?

    I have 50 yr old ligaments in my knees and they tell me to stay off the big ring 'till they're well
    lubed (7-10 miles or so).

    Bottom line: you don't have to push hard all the time to make progress. Spin 'till you're greased,
    then kick hard for awhile and then spin to recover.

    Just what works (so far) for me.

    Lon HepCat Sacramento

    Gary Mc said:


    When I was a runner there were rules of thumb about training. Example: never increase your mileage
    more than 10% in one month. Another: Your long run of the week should not exceed 40 % of your
    weekly total. The older that I got, the more ironclad these rules became.

    Last year as a biker, my 3rd on a recumbent, I injured my knee in the spring, probably by trying
    too much too soon. The injury nagged my somewhat arthritic knees for the whole season. My mileage
    dropped to 2500 miles from 3500 miles the year before.

    This season I tried to keep my riding up over the winter and progressing more slowly. Anyone read
    any rules of thumb about the pace of coming into full shape on a bike. Any guidelines on how much
    of your weekly total miles should be in your weekly long ride.

    I am in my 59th year and beyond the "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead" age.

    Gary McCarty, Greenspeed GTO, Salt Lake City

  3. Lon,

    Thanks for your input. I was thinking more of 10% increase per week with an easy week every 3rd
    or 4th week.

    I do concentrate on spinning. I came to biking from running, and spinning has always been easier
    than trying to hammer. My "intervals" are climbs and I have learned to warm up first.

    I will just give it a little more time and patience this year.

    I still wonder about how many weekly miles it should take to support long rides. I was thinking that
    probably my weekly long rides should not exceed about 50% of my average weekly total. Any thoughts
    from anyone?

    Gary McCarty, Greenspeed GTO, Salt Lake City

    "L.A." <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    Gary,

    I don't think that miles are the problem. You can modify your approach to those miles so that you
    minimize knee stress. Out of a 4 or 5 day riding week I use one for "pace" (steady without strain,
    cadence 85-95 for cruise), one for intervals (pace with a couple of all out sprints, cadence above
    105 sustained for sprint), one for major miles at slightly less than pace, cadence 80-90) and one
    for easy recovery. I'm no expert, but it seems to me that you can do the miles in such a way as to
    minimize the trauma and still gain the advantages of time on the bike. Increasing miles at 10% a
    month seems a little slow to me. How 'bout 10% a week?

    I have 50 yr old ligaments in my knees and they tell me to stay off the big ring 'till they're
    well lubed (7-10 miles or so).

    Bottom line: you don't have to push hard all the time to make progress. Spin 'till you're greased,
    then kick hard for awhile and then spin to recover.

    Just what works (so far) for me.

    Lon HepCat Sacramento

  4. "Gary Mc" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    I still wonder about how many weekly miles it should take to support long rides. I was thinking
    that probably my weekly long rides should not exceed about 50% of my average weekly total. Any
    thoughts from anyone?

    In my summer mode, Saturday long rides do seem to constitute about 50% of my weekly total... In
    cooler, darker-sooner winter months Saturday rides can be more than 50% of my total.

    I recently asked about training for bike touring and how to predict daily tour mileage for planning
    purposes. Several people suggest using one half of average weekly total as a guide for average daily
    distances on tour. So the 50% rule of thumb you suggest may be very reasonable.

    Jon Meinecke

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.