Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Ritchey Zero system rear wheel

Started by cliff · · Last activity · 4 posts · 2,175 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
29 May 2004
Last activity
3 June 2004
Original author
cliff
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
2,175
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. The Ritchey Zero system rear wheel attempts to even spoke tension by using an offset drilled rim with a hub that has narrower flange spacing: the right flange is significantly further inboard compared to a shimano hub. The drive side and non-drive side spokes are indeed closer in tension than a "standard" wheel, but the spoke "bracing angle" is reduced on the left.

    Given two wheels with the same spoke count, same spoke guage and crossing pattern, and equal drive side tension, which wheel is stronger, the Ritchey with the narrow flanges and more even spoke tension, or the standard wheel with a greater "bracing angle" due to the wider flange seperation?

    Cliff

  2. My experience with the Ritchey offset rims is that they
    crack around the spoke holes after only a few months of
    use. I've had no such problems with the Velocity Aerohead
    offset rims.

    Nick

    "cliff" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The Ritchey Zero system rear wheel attempts to even spoke
    tension by using


    an offset drilled rim with a hub that has narrower flange
    spacing: the right flange is significantly further inboard
    compared to a shimano hub. The drive side and non-drive side
    spokes are indeed closer in tension than a "standard" wheel,
    but the spoke "bracing angle" is reduced on the left.

    Quoted message said:


    Given two wheels with the same spoke count, same spoke
    guage and crossing pattern, and equal drive side tension,
    which wheel is stronger, the Ritchey with the narrow
    flanges and more even spoke tension, or the standard wheel
    with a greater "bracing angle" due to the wider flange
    seperation?

  3. On Mon, 31 May 2004 10:26:44 +1000, "LAN Support" <[email hidden]>
    scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    My experience with the Ritchey offset rims is that they
    crack around the spoke holes after only a few months of
    use. I've had no such problems with the Velocity Aerohead
    offset rims.

    Nick

    I've been using a set of OEM'd Ritchey "Rock Comp" OCR
    wheels on my bike since June '02, put about 2600 miles on
    them on all kinds of terrain and they seem to be holding up
    pretty good. Occasionally get whacked out of true a little,
    but I've so far been able to keep 'em relatively straight
    with some spoke wrenching. No cracking yet, though now
    having said it...

    -Slash
    --
    "Ebert Victorious"
    -The Onion

  4. Slash <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    On Mon, 31 May 2004 10:26:44 +1000, "LAN Support"
    <[email hidden]> scribbled:

    Quoted message said:

    My experience with the Ritchey offset rims is that they
    crack around the spoke holes after only a few months of
    use. I've had no such problems with the Velocity Aerohead
    offset rims.

    Nick

    I've been using a set of OEM'd Ritchey "Rock Comp" OCR
    wheels on my bike since June '02, put about 2600 miles on
    them on all kinds of terrain and they seem to be holding
    up pretty good. Occasionally get whacked out of true a
    little, but I've so far been able to keep 'em relatively
    straight with some spoke wrenching. No cracking yet,
    though now having said it...

    -Slash

    Why doesn't someone try to answer the question which is to
    do with wheel strength and not the relative durability of
    different rim brands?

    Nigel Grinter

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.