General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Ritalin/Cocaine World

Started by Jan · · Last activity · 1 post · 359 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
19 September 2003
Last activity
19 September 2003
Original author
Jan
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
359
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. http://www.drakeinstitute.com/home.phtml/add/2002-10-03-232946/1/

    Pay Attention: Ritalin Acts Much Like Cocaine

    Brian Vastag

    WASHINGTON -- Advanced imaging research has answered a 40-year-old question
    about methylphenidate (Ritalin), which is taken daily by 4 million to 6 million
    children in the United States: how does it work? The answer may unsettle many
    parents, because the drug acts much like cocaine, albeit cocaine dripped
    through molasses (J Neuro-sci. 2001; 21: RC121).

    Taken orally in pill form, methylphenidate rarely produces a high and has not
    been reported to be addictive. However, injected as a liqu id it sends a jolt
    that "addicts like very much," said Nora Volkow, MD, psychiatrist and imaging
    expert at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY. "They say it's like
    cocaine."

    Acknowledged as leaders in the field of brain imaging of drug effects, Volkow
    and colleagues have spent several years tracing the effects on the brain of
    drugs of addiction, using positron emission tomography (PET) and other advanced
    techniques. Among their long list of findings, they've identified the brain's
    dopamine system as a major player in compulsive behavior, including drug taking
    and overeating

    A PRAGMATIC PARADOX

    Building on that base, Volkow, associate laboratory director for life sciences
    at Brookhaven, hit the trail of a legal stimulant. Although they have used it
    to treat Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) for 40 years,
    psychiatrists and pharmacologists have never known how or why it worked.
    Chemically similar to cocaine and other stimulants, methylphenidate presents a
    pragmatic paradox: it decreases activity and increases the ability to
    concentrate in people with ADHD, but in studies, about half of those without
    ADHD find it unpleasant, like drinking too much coffee.

    "I've almost been obsessed about trying to understand [methylphenidate] with
    imaging," said Volkow at a recent media conference. "As a psychiatrist,
    sometimes I feel embarrassed [about the lack of knowledge] because this is, by
    far, the drug we prescribe most frequently to children."

    So the team went to work with PET scans to examine the dopamine system, which
    stimulates reward and motivation circuits during pleasurable experiences -
    eating, having sex, learning. ; To pick one of many pleasures, tasting
    chocolate ice cream will trigger cells in the basal ganglia to release dopamine
    molecules. These float across the synapse to neurons in a reward circuit.
    Receptors on these cells sop up the dopamine, activating signals that translate
    to "this experience is worth paying attention to." Too much signal and the
    experience feels unpleasant, over-stimulating. Too little, and the experience
    elicits a yawn; no pleasure, only boredom and distraction.

    Volkow wanted to know how methylphenidate affects this signal. But instead of
    focusing on dopamine receptors, she tracked another part of the system. After
    the pleasure signal is sent on its way, dopamine molecules recycle back to the
    neurons that produced them. There, transporters - also called autoreceptors -
    act as vacuum cleaners, scouring the synapse for another go-around.

    (see charts)

    Courtesy of Brookhaven National Laboratory

    Re presentative distribution volume PET images of the radiotracer
    [11C]raclopride from one of the study participants show that radiotracer
    binding is reduced at the level of the striatum (bottom left) after oral
    administration of 60 mg of methylphenidate. Reduced radiotracer binding
    indicates decreased availability of open dopamine receptors after
    methylphenidate-induced increases in extracellular dopamine. Cocaine produces
    a similar effect in those who take it.

    Earlier research had shown that cocaine blocks about 50% of these transporters,
    leading to a surfeit of dopamine in the synapse and a hit of pleasure. Because
    of methylphenidate's chemical similarities to cocaine, pharmacologists thought
    that it might work in the same way, only less potently, blocking fewer
    transporters. Animal studies with high doses of methylphenidate indicated that
    this could be the case.

    STARTLING RESULTS

    Using a radiotracer, [11C]raclopride, that labels dopamine transporters, the
    team scanned 11 healthy men who took various doses of oral methylphenidate. The
    results were shocking.

    "We were surprised as hell," said Volkow. "We didn't expect this." Instead of
    being a less potent transport inhibitor than cocaine, methylphenidate was more
    potent. A typical dose given to children, 0.5 mg/kg, blocked 70% of dopamine
    transporters. "The data clearly show that the notion that Ritalin is a weak
    stimulant is completely incorrect," Volkow said.

    More pondering led the team to consider two theories. Methylphenidate could be
    blocking the recycling of dopamine exactly as cocaine does, leading to strong
    signals that would yield a high and lead to addiction. But this did not jibe
    with four decades of clinical experience.

    So they considered another possibility. Perhaps methylphenidate seeps into the
    brain slowly, and as one by one the drug molecules block the transporters,
    dopamine cells shift gears. Like a union foreman yelling to an assembly line
    to slow down, the cell interprets the transporter congestion as a signal that
    too much dopamine is being produced. The neuron cranks down production, sending
    less dopamine into the synapse, suppressing the reward signal.

    The two theories opposed each other. But Volkow was unfazed. "We had to let
    the data speak for itself," she said.

    That meant measuring the amount of dopamine floating in the synapses.
    Fortunately, the investigators had at hand another radioactive label that binds
    only to open dopamine receptors. A weak PET signal would mean low numbers of
    open receptors, which in turn would mean that large amounts of dopamine
    occupied the synapse.

    After combining data from the volunteers, the team got its second surprise.
    Those who took methylphenidate displayed high levels of extra-cellular dopamine
    - just like people using cocaine. But if methylphenidate works like cocaine,
    why aren't millions of US children getting high and becoming addicted?

    CAPTURING THE ANSWER

    The answer came after Volkow combined her results with those from another
    research team. In 1999, Darin Dougherty, MD, and colleagues at Massachusetts
    General Hospital and Harvard University Medical School reported that people
    with ADHD have many more dopamine transporters than those without the condition
    (Lancet. 1999; 354: 2132-2133). This surplus increases the collective cleaning
    power of each cell; as dopamine fires into the synapse it is quickly sucked
    back, before it can home in on reward circuit receptors. "There isn't enough
    time for it to produce a signal," said Volkow.

    It finally started to make sense. Children with ADHD produce weak dopamine
    signals, meaning that usually interesting activities provide fewer rewards. In
    effect, their attention circuitry is underfed. At the same time, they
    experience a related effect: random, distracting neuron firing. Or, as Volkow
    put it, more noise and less signal. This background hum interferes with
    concentration, making the child more distractible.

    Methylphenidate flips the relationship, upping the signal and reducing the
    noise. After someone swallows methylphenidate, it enters the bloodstream and
    eventually finds the brain, where it blocks dopamine transporters and increases
    attention signaling. Again, cocaine acts the same way. But the two drugs
    differ in a significant way: methylphenidate takes about an hour to raise
    dopamine levels, whereas inhaled or injected cocaine hits the brain in seconds.
    "It is the speed at which you increase dopamine that appears to be a key
    element of the addiction process," said Volkow.

    While the team is unclear on why this speed factor is so important, future
    research will focus on it. They also plan to map dopamine levels in volunteers
    who have ADHD when they are at rest or while concentrating. Other research
    will search for molecular tools to screen children for dopamine transporter
    levels; those with high levels could be identified early and encouraged with
    behavioral solutions before methylphenidate is prescribed. "We know that
    social interactions can increase dopamine receptors," said Volkow, but whether
    better interplay also affects transporter levels is unknown.

    The long-term dopamine effects of taking methylphenidate for years, as many do,
    are another unknown. The only two large epidemiological studies conflict. One
    reports more drug addiction in children with ADHD who took methylphenidate
    compared with children with ADHD who took no drug (J Learn Disabil. 1998; 31:
    533-544); the other shows the opposite result (Pediatrics. 1999; 104: e2O).

    Because people with low levels of dopamine receptors are at risk for drug
    addiction, Volkow said that researchers need to understand if methylphenidate
    can alter the whole dynamic of the dopamine pathway. "Could chronic use of
    Ritalin make you more vulnerable to decreased dopamine brain activity as
    cocaine does? It's a key question nobody has answered."

    JAMA, August 22/29, 2001 – Vol. 286, No. 8 © 2001 American Medical
    Association. All Rights Reserved.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.