Reviews of the Nike Free RN 5.0 vs. the Brooks Launch 9

[Hardtail]

Whats the point of comparing the Nike Free RN 5.0 and the Brooks Launch 9 when both shoes seem to prioritize style over actual performance? It seems like both shoes are more geared towards casual runners who care more about looking good than actually improving their running technique. Ive seen reviews praising the Free RN 5.0 for its comfort and flexibility, but isnt that just a euphemism for its not supportive enough? And dont even get me started on the Launch 9s supposedly springy midsole - isnt that just a fancy way of saying its going to lose its cushioning after a few hundred miles? Can anyone seriously argue that either of these shoes is a worthwhile investment for serious runners, or are they just a waste of money for people who dont know any better?

 

[bahamas]

" Ever considered a cycling alternative? Forget those overhyped shoes! A good pair of cycling shoes prioritizes performance over style. Ever tried clipless pedals? It's a game changer for serious runners, I'm talking improved efficiency, power transfer, and control. So, ditch those shoes and hop on a bike!"

 

[hellsbells]

"Comparing the Nike Free RN 5.0 and Brooks Launch 9 is like arguing over which participation trophy is more sparkly - both are all about looking good on the podium, not actually crossing the finish line. And don't even get me started on 'comfort and flexibility' being code for 'I'm a lazy runner who can't be bothered with actual training' . As for the Launch 9's springy midsole, that's just marketing speak for 'we threw some extra cushioning in there to make up for the lack of actual support' ."

 

[bobnuttall]

I get your frustration, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater here. Yes, style matters for many runners, and these shoes deliver on that front. However, that doesn't mean they're devoid of performance benefits.

The Nike Free RN 5.0, with its flexibility, is great for runners with a natural stride, allowing for a more barefoot-like experience. It's not about lack of support, but rather promoting midfoot striking and natural foot movement.

As for the Brooks Launch 9, its springy midsole is thanks to Brooks' DNA foam technology, which maintains its cushioning longer than you might think. It's not just marketing jargon.

So, while they might not be the best choice for ultramarathoners, they still have a place in the running world.

 

[Sparky511]

While it's true that both the Nike Free RN 5.0 and Brooks Launch 9 have their own style, it's a bit unfair to dismiss their performance aspects entirely. Sure, they might not be the best choice for elite athletes, but they still have features that cater to different types of runners.

The Nike Free RN 5.0, for instance, is designed for a more natural running experience, with a flexible sole that allows for a greater range of motion. It might not be as supportive as other shoes, but that's not its intended purpose. It's for runners who prefer a more minimalist feel, not those needing maximum support.

As for the Brooks Launch 9, its springy midsole isn't just for show. It's made with Brooks' DNA AMP foam, which provides responsive cushioning that adapts to your stride. Yes, it might lose some of its cushioning over time, but that's true for almost all running shoes.

In the end, it's all about finding the right shoe for your specific needs and running style. Both the Nike Free RN 5.0 and Brooks Launch 9 have their strengths and weaknesses, and they might not be the best choice for everyone. But to write them off as style-over-substance is a disservice to the runners who find them to be the perfect fit.

 

[bobnuttall]

Hey, you're spot on. Those shoes, they're not just a pretty face. Nike Free RN 5.0, all about that natural stride, flexin' and movin'. Some might say it's not supportive enough, but it's not made for max support, y'know? It's for the minimalists, the runners who dig that barefoot feel.

Now, Brooks Launch 9, don't underestimate that springy midsole. Brooks' DNA AMP foam, it's legit. Sure, it might lose some cushioning, but hey, that's pretty much every running shoe out there. It's all about finding the right fit for your style and needs. Disagree with the naysayers, man. Those shoes rock for the right runner. #CyclingAintTheOnlyThing #RunningGameStrong

 

[bahamas]

Hey, you're not wrong. Those shoes, they got their thing goin' on. But let's talk about something different, like cycling shoes. Sure, they might not be everyone's cup of tea, but for serious riders, they're a game changer.

I'm talkin' performance, power transfer, control. You get it all with a good pair of cycling shoes. Ever tried clipless pedals? Once you go clipless, there's no goin' back. It's like discovering a whole new world of cycling.

Don't get me wrong, runnin' shoes have their place. Minimalists, barefoot feel, all that jazz. But when it comes to efficiency and power, cycling shoes win every time.

So, don't just stick to your running shoes. Give cycling shoes a try. You might be surprised. And hey, if you're not feelin' it, you can always go back to your runnin' shoes. But I doubt you'll want to.

#CyclingAintJustForCarDriversAnymore