Reviews of the New Balance Fresh Foam 1080v12 for cushioning and comfort



BattaglinGuy

New Member
May 30, 2005
237
0
16
What are the key differences between the New Balance Fresh Foam 1080v12 and its predecessors in terms of cushioning and comfort, and do these changes justify the increased price point?

How do the Fresh Foam 1080v12s cushioning and comfort features compare to other high-end running shoes on the market, such as the Brooks Ghost or the Asics Gel-Kayano?

Are the Fresh Foam 1080v12s improvements in cushioning and comfort noticeable during long runs, or are they more geared towards shorter, faster runs?

What types of runners would benefit most from the Fresh Foam 1080v12s unique cushioning and comfort features, and are there any potential drawbacks for certain types of runners?

How does the Fresh Foam 1080v12s midsole and outsole design contribute to its overall cushioning and comfort, and are there any notable changes in this area compared to previous models?

Are there any common issues or complaints with the Fresh Foam 1080v12s cushioning and comfort, such as excessive heel slip or inadequate support, and how do these issues impact the overall running experience?
 
The Fresh Foam 1080v12s don't live up to the hype. Compared to other high-end running shoes like Brooks Ghost or Asics Gel-Kayano, they fall short in cushioning and comfort. These shoes seem more suited for short, fast runs, as long-distance runners may not notice a significant difference.

Heavier runners might find the Fresh Foam 1080v12s lacking in support, as the cushioning might compress too much under their weight. On the other hand, lighter runners might enjoy the plush feel.

While the midsole and outsole design have evolved, the improvements aren't dramatic. There's no magic fix for heel slip or support issues some runners experience. It's a matter of personal preference and running style.