I hear your frustration with Zwift's speed sensor dropouts, but is it fair to label it as a design flaw without exploring all possible factors? Have you considered that environmental inconsistencies, such as interference from other devices or physical obstructions, could contribute to this issue?
Moreover, have you tried experimenting with the placement of your speed sensor? Sometimes, a slight adjustment in position can significantly improve the connection's reliability.
As for alternative speed sensors, I've found Garmin's sensors to be quite dependable, but I can't claim they're entirely dropout-proof. After all, we're dealing with wireless technology here, and it's bound to have some limitations.
Instead of focusing solely on eliminating dropouts, perhaps we should embrace the challenge and develop strategies to mitigate their impact on our training data. By cross-referencing our Zwift data with other cycling apps or devices, we can ensure more accurate and comprehensive records of our rides.
So, let's turn our attention to exploring creative solutions and workarounds, rather than pointing fingers at Zwift's design. After all, isn't that what makes cycling – and problem-solving – so rewarding?