Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Rebending chromo forks

Started by meb · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,355 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
13 December 2007
Last activity
23 August 2017
Original author
meb
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,355
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I had a bent chromo Peugoet fork that was letting the front tire intermittently contact the downtube. Rather than risk the tire going into the downtube and acting as a brake, I bent the fork forward by removing the front wheel, and inserting the blades between a plate and a concrete wall and simply pulling down on the handlebars. I had fulcral points about 8-12 inches from the droppouts and the rebending took place with the surprisingly small force of about 50 lbs. Given the relative ease of the rebend, it has me wondering if this bent fork is weakended and prone to potential failure.

    Any thoughts?

  2. meb said:

    I had a bent chromo Peugoet fork that was letting the front tire
    intermittently contact the downtube. Rather than risk the tire going
    into the downtube and acting as a brake, I bent the fork forward by
    removing the front wheel, and inserting the blades between a plate and a
    concrete wall and simply pulling down on the handlebars. I had fulcral
    points about 8-12 inches from the droppouts and the rebending took place
    with the surprisingly small force of about 50 lbs. Given the relative
    ease of the rebend, it has me wondering if this bent fork is weakended
    and prone to potential failure.

    Any thoughts?

    Probably ok. Obviously, this bike had run into something. Was the down
    tube or top tube dinged?

    I had a steel Motobecane (Vitus CroMo tubing) that was in a crash with
    a wrong way bike rider. LBS bent the forks back, and I never had a
    problem. There was a slight "bump" in the downtube an inch or so from
    the head tube lug.

    Art Harris

  3. meb said:

    I had a bent chromo Peugoet fork that was letting the front tire
    intermittently contact the downtube. Rather than risk the tire going
    into the downtube and acting as a brake, I bent the fork forward by
    removing the front wheel, and inserting the blades between a plate and a
    concrete wall and simply pulling down on the handlebars. I had fulcral
    points about 8-12 inches from the droppouts and the rebending took place
    with the surprisingly small force of about 50 lbs. Given the relative
    ease of the rebend, it has me wondering if this bent fork is weakended
    and prone to potential failure.

    Quoted message said:

    Any thoughts?

    1. In my opinion, most traditional 70's / 80's steel forks get "one
    free bend-back", as long as the damage is minor (i.e. as long as
    front wheel isn't touching downtube.)

    2. You must have used more like 100 lbs of force. If you used only
    50 lbs of force, the whole front end of the bike would likely
    buckle the first time you sat on the bike after the accident (I'm
    assuming you're 150+ lbs.)

    3. I bent my front fork (2040 carbon steel raleigh grand prix) in
    ~1975, and got it bent back at a local shop. It worked fine until
    a crash maybe 3 years later, when it bent again, and I replaced it
    with an aftermarket tange fork.

    In many cases, the fork is stronger than the frame, i.e. I was
    given a 1974 raleigh international 531-throughout frame with a
    very mildly bent top-tube (about 3 mm, which I had straightened to
    about 1 mm), and not even any rippling in the chrome on the front
    fork. That means the front fork was WAY STIFFER than the top tube
    of the bike.

    4. If it bends again, You can get a very nice tange fork for
    $29(plain, www.novacycles.com)-$80(chromed sloping crown).

    - Don Gillies
    San Diego, CA

  4. QUOTE='Donald Gillies said:

    I had a bent chromo Peugoet fork that was letting the front tire
    intermittently contact the downtube. Rather than risk the tire going
    into the downtube and acting as a brake, I bent the fork forward by
    removing the front wheel, and inserting the blades between a plate and a
    concrete wall and simply pulling down on the handlebars. I had fulcral
    points about 8-12 inches from the droppouts and the rebending took place
    with the surprisingly small force of about 50 lbs. Given the relative
    ease of the rebend, it has me wondering if this bent fork is weakended
    and prone to potential failure.

    Quoted message said:

    Any thoughts?

    1. In my opinion, most traditional 70's / 80's steel forks get "one
    free bend-back", as long as the damage is minor (i.e. as long as
    front wheel isn't touching downtube.)

    2. You must have used more like 100 lbs of force. If you used only
    50 lbs of force, the whole front end of the bike would likely
    buckle the first time you sat on the bike after the accident (I'm
    assuming you're 150+ lbs.)

    3. I bent my front fork (2040 carbon steel raleigh grand prix) in
    ~1975, and got it bent back at a local shop. It worked fine until
    a crash maybe 3 years later, when it bent again, and I replaced it
    with an aftermarket tange fork.

    In many cases, the fork is stronger than the frame, i.e. I was
    given a 1974 raleigh international 531-throughout frame with a
    very mildly bent top-tube (about 3 mm, which I had straightened to
    about 1 mm), and not even any rippling in the chrome on the front
    fork. That means the front fork was WAY STIFFER than the top tube
    of the bike.

    4. If it bends again, You can get a very nice tange fork for
    $29(plain, www.novacycles.com)-$80(chromed sloping crown).

    - Don Gillies
    San Diego, CA[/QUOTE]

    Are the forks a little weaker now after bending them?

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.