General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Why Chelation is not accepted

Started by M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 16, 2004 · · Last activity · 4 posts · 310 views

← Back to General fitness, health and nutrition

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
16 May 2004
Last activity
16 May 2004
Original author
M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 16, 2004
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
310
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Original post
    M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 16, 2004
    Archived post
    #1

    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The doctors HERE are proof.

    If EDTA Chelation Therapy is so Good, Why Is It Not More Widely Accepted?

    Simple, there is no proof that it is so good.

    Report
  2. mdd
    Archived post
    #2

    "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 16, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
    [email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The doctors HERE are proof.

    If EDTA Chelation Therapy is so Good, Why Is It Not More Widely


    Accepted?

    Quoted message said:


    Simple, there is no proof that it is so good.


    Is that anything like there is no proof that Mark is not genetically
    defective?

    Report
  3. Gymmy Bob
    Archived post
    #3

    No double-blinded, random sampled, peer reviewed, studies have passed the
    test so far showing the Marked Pervert is not insane or genetically
    defective. EnvironMENTAL and heretical studies were not done.

    "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 16, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
    [email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The doctors HERE are proof.

    If EDTA Chelation Therapy is so Good, Why Is It Not More Widely


    Accepted?

    Quoted message said:


    Simple, there is no proof that it is so good.


    Is that anything like there is no proof that Mark is not genetically
    defective?

    Report
  4. David Wright
    Archived post
    #4
    In article said:


    "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-May 16, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
    [email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Jan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The doctors HERE are proof.

    If EDTA Chelation Therapy is so Good, Why Is It Not More Widely


    Accepted?

    Quoted message said:


    Simple, there is no proof that it is so good.


    Is that anything like there is no proof that Mark is not genetically
    defective?

    No, because there are numerous studies that show that chelation is no
    better than placebo.

    There is no proof that you are anything other than a pee-drinking,
    puerile troll, however.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

    Report

Keep exploring

Browse the sectionGeneral fitness, health and nutrition Return to CyclingForumsStart at the home page Search discussionsFind another thread

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.