On Oct 15, 10:09 pm, "[email hidden]" <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:37:57 +1000, Chilla
Quoted message said:<[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:[email hidden] wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> On Oct 15, 9:44 am, LarbGai <[email hidden]> wrote:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>>On Oct 15, 3:16 pm, Steve Kramer <[email hidden]> wrote:
>>Next Sunday I'll look through Google again toQuoted message said:Quoted message said:>>>see if I missed anyone important, but Thunderbird seems to do a pretty
>>>good job.Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>>>Steve Kramer
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>>******Just like you do everyday Pinkie.........;-)
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>>If we did'nt post about you your ego would curl up and die.........
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:>>The lawyers contacted you yet????
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> I think any lawyer not trying to steal his client's money would tell
> him that to file a lawsuit based upon an internet post he would first
> have to prove that the defendant was the one who 'made' the post, not
> just which computer the post originated. Anyone can call themselves
> anyone else. The trick is to prove it. This is what saves most trolls
> from law suits.Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> Howard
Quoted message said:Interesting, as some of the evidence presented in recent Microsoft and
Imron trials was e-mail, and not only that but internal company
e-mail.Quoted message said:Bruce in Bangkok
[email hidden]That's right, Bruce. INTERNAL company e-mails are all recorded by most
major company's IT division, (especially Microsoft,) each poster must
log on to a station with their own 'private password,' and key-stroke
monitors are common. Were these e-mails used as 'proof' or as
corroborating evidence? YOU say they were evidence. Evidence is NOT
proof. Evidence has to be substantiated. Proved. And PROOF is
required. Even in Thailand.When coming from a 'home' computer with no password protection, with
several people having access to the same computer, do you REALLY
believe that any court would accept an e-mail as PROOF of anything? I
can tell you as fact that they won't in Thailand. With as many times
as Robert Johnson publicly stated that he had me arrested, which was a
complete and easily PROVABLE lie, there wasn't a lawyer in the
province who would take the case despite complete police reports of
the incidents. To a man (an woman) they ALL stated there was NO WAY to
PROVE who made the post, regardless of who's name was on it or who's
computer it came from, so it would be a waste of my time and money to
take him to civil court for libel.Steve Kramer
"PhotoEnvisions" Photography
Chiang Mai, Thailandhttp://www.photoenvisions.com- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
Say Hey Stevie:
I bet you have more time then money on your hands, eh? I'll bet you
10,000 baht that at my age I am in better physical shape then you are
at your age. The mental part has already been proven. when I win the
money goes to a government or NGO charity here in Chiang Mai. Now!
money talks and bulls**t walks. What ya gonna do dude?
P.S. I'll even pay for your physical examination at Chiang Mai Ram
One.
5555 Yee-Haw !!