General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: Whacko Jacko Chow

Started by Stan Horwitz · · Last activity · 5 posts · 337 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
7 June 2005
Last activity
7 June 2005
Original author
Stan Horwitz
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
337
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Sheldon said:

    What're his favorite snackeroos, anyone know? Will Michael Jackson be
    permitted to wear his Dr. Dentins in the big House? Anyone think he's
    going up the river?

    Whacko Jacko will be acquitted. There are too many doubts regarding the
    credibility of the prosecutor's witnesses against MJ. Even if MJ is
    convicted in this trial, he is sure to appeal. MJ can afford to pay for
    a lot of high powered legal resources, so if his money hasn't already
    bought him an acquittal, there's always the appeal.

    What would be best is if MJ fades into obscurity. Unfortunately, that's
    not going to happen either, even if he is convicted. Every time I see MJ
    on TV or in the press, he gives me the creeps. Any parent who allows his
    or her child to spend time alone with that nut case should also be
    prosecuted for negligence in my opinion.

  2. Stan Horwitz said:

    Whacko Jacko will be acquitted. There are too many doubts regarding the
    credibility of the prosecutor's witnesses against MJ. Even if MJ is
    convicted in this trial, he is sure to appeal. MJ can afford to pay for
    a lot of high powered legal resources, so if his money hasn't already
    bought him an acquittal, there's always the appeal.

    What would be best is if MJ fades into obscurity. Unfortunately, that's
    not going to happen either, even if he is convicted. Every time I see MJ
    on TV or in the press, he gives me the creeps. Any parent who allows his
    or her child to spend time alone with that nut case should also be
    prosecuted for negligence in my opinion.

    IF he is acquitted I expect that his next court experiences will be
    malpractice suits against his psychiatrist and plastic surgeons. You gotta
    wonder about a guy who spends so much money on cosmetic surgery and ends up
    looking like a damned freak.

  3. "Stan Horwitz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    What would be best is if MJ fades into obscurity. Unfortunately, that's
    not going to happen either, even if he is convicted. Every time I see MJ
    on TV or in the press, he gives me the creeps. Any parent who allows his
    or her child to spend time alone with that nut case should also be
    prosecuted for negligence in my opinion.

    I couldn't agree more, Stan. I got yelled at when I said, I wouldn't
    leave my cat with him, for Pete's sake. Innocent until proven guilty,
    blah blah blah.

    That has nothing to do with it. There were questions before, never
    mind what man sleeps with children, yucky, I would never ever
    bring my kid over there for a sleepover. I don't care if he's guilty
    or not. Common sense tells you just stay away from that.

    Sorta tells me the parents had a motive of some sort.

    nancy

  4. Nancy Young wrote:

    .....That has nothing to do with it. There were questions before, never

    Quoted message said:

    mind what man sleeps with children, yucky, I would never ever
    bring my kid over there for a sleepover. I don't care if he's guilty
    or not. Common sense tells you just stay away from that.

    Sorta tells me the parents had a motive of some sort.

    Yeah they did. Its called "greed".

    Cheers
    Cathy

    Quoted message said:


    nancy

  5. Nancy Young said:

    I couldn't agree more, Stan. I got yelled at when I said, I wouldn't
    leave my cat with him, for Pete's sake. Innocent until proven guilty,
    blah blah blah.

    Innocent until proven guilty?? In my books, sleeping with children would be
    enough to get him committed to a mental institution. Inappropriate touching
    would get him a trip to the big house, and no protective custody. Stick him
    into a predator society so he can be on the other end of it for a while.

    Quoted message said:

    That has nothing to do with it. There were questions before, never
    mind what man sleeps with children, yucky, I would never ever
    bring my kid over there for a sleepover. I don't care if he's guilty
    or not. Common sense tells you just stay away from that.

    Sorta tells me the parents had a motive of some sort.

    Maybe after the parents finish suing Jackson the kids can turn around and sue
    the parents.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.