General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: well....[censored].

Started by jbuch · · Last activity · 2 posts · 275 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
6 June 2005
Last activity
6 June 2005
Original author
jbuch
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
275
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Jim Bard said:

    "Lass Chance" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Convinced the battery in my scale was surely dying, I replaced it. Then
    I dragged the damn thing all over the floor to find the "right" spot,
    the spot where the numbers would read, "190". Inagine my dismay to
    finally come to grips with the hard fact----only one pound gone in a
    week.

    AAAAAGGGGHHHHH.

    OK. Life is full of dissapointments. I warched "Hud" on TV this
    morning....and a least I didnt have to shoot all my cattle due to Hoof
    and Mouth disease....so, things could be worse.

    Now....my thinking was...."as long as I keep it to 20 carbs a day, it
    shouldnt matter where those carbs came from."

    Evidentally.....this is not true. If I've learned anything this week,
    it's this:
    Ya cant drink a liter of wine a day and lose weight.

    But what I want to know is.....WHY?

    why are wine carbs dfferent from food carbs? Where did my logic err?
    What exactly is it that makes this happen? Does alcohol....stop ketosis?
    Or...what?

    Of course, I also did O exercise this week.

    There is no such thing as a Free Lunch.
    Nor a "get out of jail free" card.
    Do NOT pass GO. Do not collect $200.

    Color me bummed.

    sigh.

    Is there anything worse than the knowledge, "I did this to myself"?

    LassChance

    Start LC~5-16-05
    202-194-165
    (i only weigh on Sunday)

    Moving aside from the engaging online argument, here....

    Low-carb diets largely work for about two reasons...focusing your meals on
    lower-carb foods cause you to feel less hungry while your body switches to
    fat-burinng mode (burning up all those carbs your body stored as fat while
    you were eating more that your body needed), and also it seems that it takes
    more energy to burn stored fat than it does high-carb foods taken in
    directly.

    I do not believe in eating the "low-carb" tastealikes that often end up
    being higher in calories than the natural foods that are higher in carbs,
    but are similar in calories. Calories count, and there's no way around
    that. Fewer calories in and more calories out results in weight loss.
    Nothing magic about a low-carb diet. It mostly keeps you from having sugar
    spikes and keeps you from being hungry a lot, while using more of your body
    energy to digest what you have eaten.

    A lot of people here don't like JC, but he's been telling the truth for a
    long time... eat less and exercise more. Of course, he's a Texan. We do
    that a lot, tell the truth whether people want to hear it or not.

    Lots of people don't like George Bush, either, he does the same thing.
    Tells the truth whether people want to hear it or not.

    Except for Weapons of Mass Destruction...... and more.

    Presidents lie.

    Some more than others.

    Amd peope who don't

    Quoted message said:

    exactly want to hear the truth usually getting snake-bit on their butts.
    And then want to blame someone else for it.

    Go figure.

    --
    ................................

    Keepsake gift for young girls.
    Unique and personal one-of-a-kind.
    Builds strong minds 12 ways.
    Guaranteed satisfaction
    - courteous money back
    - keep bonus gifts

    http://www.alicebook.com

  2. "Except for Weapons of Mass Destruction...... and more.
    Presidents lie.
    Some more than others. "

    Of course for it to be a lie, Bush would have had to have been the one
    person in the world who knew for a fact that Iraq did not in fact have
    WMD's. The same WMD's that not only US intelligence believed were
    there, but also British, Russian, and Israeli intelligence. Even Hans
    Blix and the UN weapons inspectors labeled the Iraqi's as deceptive and
    unwilling to supply proof of the status of thousands of WMD's the UN
    knew were previously there. And it's strange how it's a lie when Bush
    says it, yet wasn't a lie when Bill Clinton, M. Albright, John Kerry,
    and many others also made the same statements regarding WMD's based on
    the same intelligence.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.