General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Re: weight loss

Started by pam_in_sc · · Last activity · 1 post · 526 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
6 June 2005
Last activity
6 June 2005
Original author
pam_in_sc
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
526
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Doug Freese said:

    Glycemic index is interesting but Glycemic load may shed some light.
    http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/pyramids.html

    ""There is one thing that a food's glycemic index does not tell us: the
    relative amount of carbohydrate in a given food. Take watermelon as an
    example; the sweet-tasting fruit has a high glycemic index. But a slice
    of watermelon has only a small amount of carbohydrate per serving (as
    the name suggests, watermelon is made up mostly of water). Looking at
    the glycemic index alone may not tell us everything we need to know
    about a food's impact on blood sugar levels. So researchers have
    developed a new way of classifying foods that takes into account both
    the amount of carbohydrate in the food and the impact of that
    carbohydrate on blood sugar levels. This measure is called the glycemic
    load. (8, 9) A food's glycemic load is determined by multiplying its
    glycemic index by the amount of carbohydrate it contains. (For a listing
    of low, medium and high glycemic load foods, see the sidebar,
    Carbohydrates and the Glycemic Load.)"

    Yes, glycemic load is a more useful concept. But I'm not inclined to do
    detailed calculations, so it works for me to start from the amount of
    carbohydrate and then assume I can have maybe 25% more or less depending
    on the glycemic index. When I first tried using the glycemic index I
    studied the tables pretty carefully, so I know it isn't always what you
    would expect--eg. apples are significantly better than oranges.

    Quoted message said:

    But you are failing to provide yourself with fuel and why I was
    suggesting a maltodextrin drink that would provide needed cards and may
    not cause a spike.

    Quoted message said:

    And my digestion is also efficient at least up to 70-80% of maximum
    heart rate, so I eat regular food while bicycling.

    What are you calling "regular food?" For some it a double whopper and
    hold the bread. 🙂

    If I am going to eat carbs I want to eat what seems like a treat, so
    sometimes that is tortilla chips or icecream. Sports drinks are
    definitely not in that category--I've never liked sweet drinks,
    particularly those that are artificially flavored. Your idea makes
    sense, but isn't particularly appealing.

    My current theory for a race (a sprint triathlon with a 750 meter swim,
    11 mile bike, 5 k run--took me almost 2 hours) is low-GI bread and
    cheese a couple of hours before, a banana right before, and a peanut
    butter and jelly sandwich (on regular bread) during the bike ride, with
    water to drink. I kept up the peanut butter and jelly and bananas for a
    5 1/2 hour bike ride last weekend and that seemed to work, though after
    the first couple of hours I was riding at pretty low intensity. I'm
    going to try the idea of low-fat chocolate milk as a recovery drink.

    Pam
    http://deeplanguage.blogspot.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.