UK and Europe · Public discussion

Re: We're all Dinosaurs

Started by MSeries · · Last activity · 3 posts · 868 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
12 December 2004
Last activity
12 December 2004
Original author
MSeries
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
868
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Not Responding said:

    Yesterday I met some internet people in RL. It was a ride put together
    by someone on the C+ web forum.

    It was all good fun. But I was struck by how this new generation of
    internet users have almost no knowledge of usenet. I've been using
    usenet for years; I like the relatively open and non-proprietorial
    structure. I even grudgingly tolerate deja style archiving as it
    creates a truely open and searchable cache of knowledge.

    It appears that however much I dislike web forums, they do seem to be
    taking over as the internet discussion tool.

    So why do you C+ forum then ? What is your point ? That everyone should
    be using usenet instead of web forums ? While I agree that it would
    indeed serve the same purpose, especially as the C+ forum with no
    graphics I'd like to suggest a possible reason why usenet isn't used
    more widely. Not everyone uses an mail/new client. Not everyone is able
    nor wants to install such a beast on their machines. Look at the flack
    people, including myself, have recieved on here when attempting to use a
    browser interface to u.r.c. . Google groups access is delayed makingit
    useless, GG 2 is quirky, intermitent and doesn't follow the rules.
    Cycclingforums is highly frowned upon. Is it any wonder that people
    don't bother using usenet for this group ?

  2. James Annan said:

    ......................, although it's only usenet
    and it doesn't have to be taken that seriously

    sigh, I know but in it sometimes is taken very seriously by posters on
    here. Such replies such as "if you can play by the rules then don't play
    at all" simply because GG2 wasn't threading properly is really not
    necessary.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    GG 2 is quirky, intermitent and doesn't follow the rules.
    Cycclingforums is highly frowned upon. Is it any wonder that people
    don't bother using usenet for this group ?

    I think there are already plenty of valuable contributors here: I'm
    happy that most people go elsewhere.

    Can never have plenty of valuable contributors, how will we know what we
    are missing ?

    Quoted message said:

    I'm on a couple of email lists that also work pretty well, but on the
    whole I am wary of privately-owned (and moderated) fora.

    James

  3. Not Responding said:

    On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 06:39:49 -0700, MSeries <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It appears that however much I dislike web forums, they do seem to be
    taking over as the internet discussion tool.

    So why do you C+ forum then ? What is your point ? That everyone should
    be using usenet instead of web forums ?

    My "point" was merely an observation that in the past if you wanted to
    discuss your favoured subject, you used usenet and so did all other
    interested parties on the internet. Today most people and certainly
    the new generation of users turn to web forums by default.

    I'm not sure I was saying everyone *should* use usenet; it's a matter
    of choice. But we as a community are certainly losing something
    collectively as the division, privatisation and censorship of
    discussion takes place.

    Why do I use the C+ forum? Because I like talking about cycling. The
    fact that I don't rate then venue is secondary.

    I use the C+ forum for the same reason as you.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.