Re: we need is a president who rides a bike

[still me]

On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:34:13 -0700, donquijote1954
<[email protected]> wrote:

>After having a president by and for the SUVs, we need a chance for our
>humble bikes. Maybe we need to come up with a bicycle party, since
>they have a Big Oil party.

Somehow I think the oil party might exercise a bit more power.

 

[donquijote1954]

On Aug 2, 10:12 am, still me <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:34:13 -0700, donquijote1954
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >After having a president by and for the SUVs, we need a chance for our
> >humble bikes. Maybe we need to come up with a bicycle party, since
> >they have a Big Oil party.
>
> Somehow I think the oil party might exercise a bit more power.

Yes, in a system where money talks and ********... But the ratio
shouldn't be greater than 100 to 1.

 

[still me]

On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:06:41 -0000, donquijote1954
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >After having a president by and for the SUVs, we need a chance for our
>> >humble bikes. Maybe we need to come up with a bicycle party, since
>> >they have a Big Oil party.
>>
>> Somehow I think the oil party might exercise a bit more power.
>
>Yes, in a system where money talks and ********... But the ratio
>shouldn't be greater than 100 to 1.

I don't think the bicycle party could rally even the money for a bike
path, let alone a $400b war.

 

[donquijote1954]

On Aug 2, 7:37 pm, still me <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:06:41 -0000, donquijote1954
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >After having a president by and for the SUVs, we need a chance for our
> >> >humble bikes. Maybe we need to come up with a bicycle party, since
> >> >they have a Big Oil party.
>
> >> Somehow I think the oil party might exercise a bit more power.
>
> >Yes, in a system where money talks and ********... But the ratio
> >shouldn't be greater than 100 to 1.
>
> I don't think the bicycle party could rally even the money for a bike
> path, let alone a $400b war.

That's why we need the bicycle party.