Alan S said:On 8 Feb 2005 22:17:04 -0800, [email hidden] wrote:
x-posts cut
|Hi,
| This study was done by the very anti-supplement
epidemiology
Quoted message said:|team led be Dr. Charles Hennekins at Harvard University.
Originally posted to:
sci.med.nutrition,misc.health.diabetes,sci.life-extension,sci.med.cardiology,misc.health.alternative
Quoted message said:
So, tell me, what deep-seated need for recognition caused you to
x-post this in five different newsgroups?Don't bother answering, I'm not from your originating ng and won't
see
Quoted message said:it.
Hi Alan,
No bother at all, nor was repasting the groups header. Thx for
the feed back. All criticism is constructive, and I make a special
effort use it constructively. I repeatedly ask for it, but get so
little that my self improvement efforts are impeeded. It would help if
you could be more specific as to what it is you didn't like. Yes, I
have a deep seated need for recognition as do all heard animals. Also
part of my decision to cross post was in order to see if other group
members had any reasons to doubt my vitamin C conclusion. Just about
all the sci.life-extension people agree or remain silent, so I
sometimes wonder if maybe I'm not right on target. If your gripe is my
criticism of the medical establishment or of the Dr. Hennekins team I
would like to know. I will point out that they are imperfect like all
of us, but unlike many they potentially impact my life and health span
when they don't perform up to their capabilities. This was one of my
milder criticisms of them.
Like to hear from anyone who disagrees or has any other
complaint.
Thomas