Home Road Cycling Re: UCI "Slow Tour" for 2007
Thread details
What we know about this thread
Original section Road Cycling
Published 1 April 2005
Last activity 2 April 2005
Original author Jim Flom
Posts 4
Discussion status Public discussion
Total views 301
Views / 30 days 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–4 of 4 Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Original post Jim Flom
Archived post
1 April 2005, 00:24 UTC
#1
"MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: MagillaGorilla said: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/apr05/apr01newsspecial
This is gay.
Thanks,
Magilla
This whole April Fool's thing is gay for any reputable publication to do. You don't see the NY Times doing it.
Nice attempt at a recovery, sucker.
MagillaGorilla
Archived post
1 April 2005, 23:44 UTC
#2
Jim Flom said: "MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: MagillaGorilla said: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/apr05/apr01newsspecial
This is gay.
Thanks,
Magilla
This whole April Fool's thing is gay for any reputable publication to do. You don't see the NY Times doing it.
Nice attempt at a recovery, sucker.
It wasn't an attempt. It actually happened.
Magilla
2 April 2005, 02:51 UTC
#3
"Jim Flom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:Pw03e.140468$gJ3.15730@clgrps13...
Quoted message said: "MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said: MagillaGorilla said: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/apr05/apr01newsspecial
This is gay.
Thanks,
Magilla
This whole April Fool's thing is gay for any reputable publication to do. You don't see the NY Times doing it.
Nice attempt at a recovery, sucker.
MagillaGorilla
Archived post
2 April 2005, 15:19 UTC
#4
Chris M said: That is for others to decide. I would say that it (the recovery) was merely an attempt that did *not* happen. You remain looking as foolish (worse actually) after your follow-up (to your own post) than after the OP only. But then again, you are very well known as the guy that will say anything no matter how obviously untrue...
Hey dumbass,
I figured out it was one of those gay-ass April Fool's articles about 2 sentences into it (even though it was only March 31 here in the US). I only posted the follow-up so you 980 SAT scores in here wouldn't go apeshit about it and claim you brought it to my attention first.
What's untrue?
Take care,
Magilla
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
1 guest
· 0 bots
· 1 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.