Road Cycling · Public discussion

Re: UCI "Slow Tour" for 2007

Started by Jim Flom · · Last activity · 4 posts · 301 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
1 April 2005
Last activity
2 April 2005
Original author
Jim Flom
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
301
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    MagillaGorilla said:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/apr05/apr01newsspecial

    This is gay.

    Thanks,

    Magilla

    This whole April Fool's thing is gay for any reputable publication to do.
    You don't see the NY Times doing it.

    Nice attempt at a recovery, sucker.

  2. Jim Flom said:

    "MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    MagillaGorilla said:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/apr05/apr01newsspecial

    This is gay.

    Thanks,

    Magilla

    This whole April Fool's thing is gay for any reputable publication to do.
    You don't see the NY Times doing it.

    Nice attempt at a recovery, sucker.

    It wasn't an attempt. It actually happened.

    Magilla

  3. "Jim Flom" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:Pw03e.140468$gJ3.15730@clgrps13...

    Quoted message said:

    "MagillaGorilla" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    MagillaGorilla said:

    http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2005/apr05/apr01newsspecial

    This is gay.

    Thanks,

    Magilla

    This whole April Fool's thing is gay for any reputable publication to do.
    You don't see the NY Times doing it.

    Nice attempt at a recovery, sucker.

  4. Chris M said:

    That is for others to decide. I would say that it (the recovery) was
    merely an attempt that did *not* happen. You remain looking as foolish
    (worse actually) after your follow-up (to your own post) than after the
    OP only. But then again, you are very well known as the guy that will
    say anything no matter how obviously untrue...

    Hey dumbass,

    I figured out it was one of those gay-ass April Fool's articles about 2
    sentences into it (even though it was only March 31 here in the US). I
    only posted the follow-up so you 980 SAT scores in here wouldn't go
    apeshit about it and claim you brought it to my attention first.

    What's untrue?

    Take care,

    Magilla

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 1 guest ·0 bots ·1 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.